On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 11:55:31AM -0700, Max Filippov wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:48 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
[ Upstream commit 2663147dc7465cb29040a05cc4286fdd839978b5 ]
New pt_regs should indicate that there's no syscall, not that there's syscall #0. While at it wrap macro body in do/while and parenthesize macro arguments.
Signed-off-by: Max Filippov jcmvbkbc@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org
arch/xtensa/include/asm/processor.h | 21 ++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
This patch should not be taken to any of the stable trees, except maybe 5.0.y, because NO_SYSCALL was introduced to arch/xtensa in 5.0.
Now dropped from everywhere except 5.0.y, thanks.
This patch doesn't have any cc:stable tags, I'm curious why was it chosen for stable and what can I do to prevent that in the future?
Sasha's tools picked this up and you should have been cc:ed on it when it was selected a few weeks ago.
thanks,
greg k-h