On Tue, Sep 03 2024 at 18:28:14 +0530, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 02:53:57PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 2:07 PM gregkh@linuxfoundation.org gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 11:56:17AM +0000, Siddh Raman Pant wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 16:32:36 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
udp: Set SOCK_RCU_FREE earlier in udp_lib_get_port().
[...]
We had the same bug in TCP and fixed it in commit 871019b22d1b ("net: set SOCK_RCU_FREE before inserting socket into hashtable").
Let's apply the same fix for UDP.
[...]
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-41041 to this issue.
Affected and fixed versions
Issue introduced in 4.20 with commit 6acc9b432e67 and fixed in 5.4.280 with commit 7a67c4e47626 Issue introduced in 4.20 with commit 6acc9b432e67 and fixed in 5.10.222 with commit 9f965684c57cThese versions don't have the TCP fix backported. Please do so.
What fix backported exactly to where? Please be more specific. Better yet, please provide working, and tested, backports.
commit 871019b22d1bcc9fab2d1feba1b9a564acbb6e99 Author: Stanislav Fomichev sdf@fomichev.me Date: Wed Nov 8 13:13:25 2023 -0800
net: set SOCK_RCU_FREE before inserting socket into hashtable... Fixes: 6acc9b432e67 ("bpf: Add helper to retrieve socket in BPF")
It seems 871019b22d1bcc9fab2d1feba1b9a564acbb6e99 has not been pushed to 5.10 or 5.4 lts
Stanislav mentioned a WARN_ONCE() being hit, I presume we could push the patch to 5.10 and 5.4.
I guess this was skipped because of a merge conflict.
Yes, the commit does not apply, we need someone to send a working backport for us to be able to take it.
Siddh, can you please do this?
Sure.
I see there are Stable-dep commits too, but the seem unrelated and require some commits from another feature patchset. Do I need to backport them too?
Thanks, Siddh