On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 02:40:52PM +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
Hi Greg, Sasha,
On 02/09/2024 19:25, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
commit e06959e9eebdfea4654390f53b65cff57691872e upstream.
After having flushed endpoints that didn't cause the creation of new subflows, it is important to check endpoints can be re-created, re-using previously used IDs.
Before the previous commit, the client would not have been able to re-create the subflow that was previously rejected.
The 'Fixes' tag here below is the same as the one from the previous commit: this patch here is not fixing anything wrong in the selftests, but it validates the previous fix for an issue introduced by this commit ID.
FYI, Sasha has applied all the patches from this series, except this one, the backport of e06959e9eebd ("selftests: mptcp: join: test for flush/re-add endpoints").
In theory, this commit can be applied without any conflicts now that commit b5e2fb832f48 ("selftests: mptcp: add explicit test case for remove/readd") has been queued in v6.10.
Thanks, I've done that right now.
greg k-h