6.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Yuntao Wang yuntao.wang@linux.dev
[ Upstream commit c85da64ce2c36bba469f6feede9ca768f0361741 ]
When reading the fdt_size value, the argument passed to dt_mem_next_cell() is dt_root_addr_cells, but it should be dt_root_size_cells.
The same issue occurs when reading the scratch_size value.
Use a helper function to simplify the code and fix these issues.
Fixes: 274cdcb1c004 ("arm64: add KHO support") Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang yuntao.wang@linux.dev Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251115134753.179931-5-yuntao.wang@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) robh@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/of/fdt.c | 16 ++++------------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c index 0c18bdefbbeea..de16785a48695 100644 --- a/drivers/of/fdt.c +++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c @@ -924,26 +924,18 @@ static void __init early_init_dt_check_kho(void) { unsigned long node = chosen_node_offset; u64 fdt_start, fdt_size, scratch_start, scratch_size; - const __be32 *p; - int l;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER) || (long)node < 0) return;
- p = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "linux,kho-fdt", &l); - if (l != (dt_root_addr_cells + dt_root_size_cells) * sizeof(__be32)) + if (!of_flat_dt_get_addr_size(node, "linux,kho-fdt", + &fdt_start, &fdt_size)) return;
- fdt_start = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, &p); - fdt_size = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, &p); - - p = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "linux,kho-scratch", &l); - if (l != (dt_root_addr_cells + dt_root_size_cells) * sizeof(__be32)) + if (!of_flat_dt_get_addr_size(node, "linux,kho-scratch", + &scratch_start, &scratch_size)) return;
- scratch_start = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, &p); - scratch_size = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, &p); - kho_populate(fdt_start, fdt_size, scratch_start, scratch_size); }