Hi Gregory,
As a general thing, for patches affecting arm64 could you please Cc the linx-arm-kernel mailing list (linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org). Some folk working on arm/arm64 aren't subscribed to LKML, and it means patches like this may get missed.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 04:33:38PM +0200, gregory.herrero@oracle.com wrote:
From: Gregory Herrero gregory.herrero@oracle.com
Currently, if a section has a relocation to '_mcount' symbol, a new __mcount_loc entry will be added whatever the relocation type is. This is problematic when a relocation to '_mcount' is in the middle of a section and is not a call for ftrace use.
Such relocation could be generated with below code for example: bool is_mcount(unsigned long addr) { return (target == (unsigned long) &_mcount); }
With this snippet of code, ftrace will try to patch the mcount location generated by this code on module load and fail with:
Call trace: ftrace_bug+0xa0/0x28c ftrace_process_locs+0x2f4/0x430 ftrace_module_init+0x30/0x38 load_module+0x14f0/0x1e78 __do_sys_finit_module+0x100/0x11c __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x28/0x34 el0_svc_common+0x88/0x194 el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x8c el0_svc+0x8/0xc ---[ end trace d828d06b36ad9d59 ]--- ftrace failed to modify [<ffffa2dbf3a3a41c>] 0xffffa2dbf3a3a41c actual: 66:a9:3c:90 Initializing ftrace call sites ftrace record flags: 2000000 (0) expected tramp: ffffa2dc6cf66724
Which code specifically is this triggering for? Is this something in an upstream kernel, or out-of-tree patches?
Can you say which toolchain you're using, too?
So Limit the relocation type to R_AARCH64_CALL26 as in perl version of recordmcount.
Given our patching code expects each callsite to be:
bl _mcount
... this looks sane to me, and I *think* that's sound for modules too.
Fixes: ed60453fa8f8 ("ARM: 6511/1: ftrace: add ARM support for C version of recordmcount")
That's a 32-bit arm commit. I suspect that was meant to be:
Fixes: af64d2aa872a1747 ("ftrace: Add arm64 support to recordmcount")
Signed-off-by: Gregory Herrero gregory.herrero@oracle.com
scripts/recordmcount.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/recordmcount.c b/scripts/recordmcount.c index 7225107a9aaf..e59022b3f125 100644 --- a/scripts/recordmcount.c +++ b/scripts/recordmcount.c @@ -434,6 +434,11 @@ static int arm_is_fake_mcount(Elf32_Rel const *rp) return 1; } +static int arm64_is_fake_mcount(Elf64_Rel const *rp) +{
- return ELF64_R_TYPE(w(rp->r_info)) != R_AARCH64_CALL26;
+}
/* 64-bit EM_MIPS has weird ELF64_Rela.r_info.
- http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/manuals/4000/007-4658-001/pdf/007-4658-001.p...
- We interpret Table 29 Relocation Operation (Elf64_Rel, Elf64_Rela) [p.40]
@@ -547,6 +552,7 @@ static int do_file(char const *const fname) make_nop = make_nop_arm64; rel_type_nop = R_AARCH64_NONE; ideal_nop = ideal_nop4_arm64;
is_fake_mcount64 = arm64_is_fake_mcount;
As above, I think this is sound, but if you could answer my questions that'd be helpful.
Thanks, Mark.
case EM_IA_64: reltype = R_IA64_IMM64; break; case EM_MIPS: /* reltype: e_class */ break; -- 2.27.0