6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Olga Kornievskaia okorniev@redhat.com
commit bee47cb026e762841f3faece47b51f985e215edb upstream.
Scott Mayhew discovered a security exploit in NFS over TLS in tls_alert_recv() due to its assumption it can read data from the msg iterator's kvec..
kTLS implementation splits TLS non-data record payload between the control message buffer (which includes the type such as TLS aler or TLS cipher change) and the rest of the payload (say TLS alert's level/description) which goes into the msg payload buffer.
This patch proposes to rework how control messages are setup and used by sock_recvmsg().
If no control message structure is setup, kTLS layer will read and process TLS data record types. As soon as it encounters a TLS control message, it would return an error. At that point, NFS can setup a kvec backed msg buffer and read in the control message such as a TLS alert. Msg iterator can advance the kvec pointer as a part of the copy process thus we need to revert the iterator before calling into the tls_alert_recv.
Reported-by: Scott Mayhew smayhew@redhat.com Fixes: 5e052dda121e ("SUNRPC: Recognize control messages in server-side TCP socket code") Suggested-by: Trond Myklebust trondmy@hammerspace.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia okorniev@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever chuck.lever@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c @@ -257,20 +257,47 @@ svc_tcp_sock_process_cmsg(struct socket }
static int -svc_tcp_sock_recv_cmsg(struct svc_sock *svsk, struct msghdr *msg) +svc_tcp_sock_recv_cmsg(struct socket *sock, unsigned int *msg_flags) { union { struct cmsghdr cmsg; u8 buf[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(u8))]; } u; - struct socket *sock = svsk->sk_sock; + u8 alert[2]; + struct kvec alert_kvec = { + .iov_base = alert, + .iov_len = sizeof(alert), + }; + struct msghdr msg = { + .msg_flags = *msg_flags, + .msg_control = &u, + .msg_controllen = sizeof(u), + }; + int ret; + + iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_DEST, &alert_kvec, 1, + alert_kvec.iov_len); + ret = sock_recvmsg(sock, &msg, MSG_DONTWAIT); + if (ret > 0 && + tls_get_record_type(sock->sk, &u.cmsg) == TLS_RECORD_TYPE_ALERT) { + iov_iter_revert(&msg.msg_iter, ret); + ret = svc_tcp_sock_process_cmsg(sock, &msg, &u.cmsg, -EAGAIN); + } + return ret; +} + +static int +svc_tcp_sock_recvmsg(struct svc_sock *svsk, struct msghdr *msg) +{ int ret; + struct socket *sock = svsk->sk_sock;
- msg->msg_control = &u; - msg->msg_controllen = sizeof(u); ret = sock_recvmsg(sock, msg, MSG_DONTWAIT); - if (unlikely(msg->msg_controllen != sizeof(u))) - ret = svc_tcp_sock_process_cmsg(sock, msg, &u.cmsg, ret); + if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_CTRUNC) { + msg->msg_flags &= ~(MSG_CTRUNC | MSG_EOR); + if (ret == 0 || ret == -EIO) + ret = svc_tcp_sock_recv_cmsg(sock, &msg->msg_flags); + } return ret; }
@@ -321,7 +348,7 @@ static ssize_t svc_tcp_read_msg(struct s iov_iter_advance(&msg.msg_iter, seek); buflen -= seek; } - len = svc_tcp_sock_recv_cmsg(svsk, &msg); + len = svc_tcp_sock_recvmsg(svsk, &msg); if (len > 0) svc_flush_bvec(bvec, len, seek);
@@ -1019,7 +1046,7 @@ static ssize_t svc_tcp_read_marker(struc iov.iov_base = ((char *)&svsk->sk_marker) + svsk->sk_tcplen; iov.iov_len = want; iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_DEST, &iov, 1, want); - len = svc_tcp_sock_recv_cmsg(svsk, &msg); + len = svc_tcp_sock_recvmsg(svsk, &msg); if (len < 0) return len; svsk->sk_tcplen += len;