On (06/19/18 09:23), Steven Rostedt wrote:
On (06/19/18 09:52), Petr Mladek wrote:
On Mon 2018-06-18 19:07:18, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
On (06/18/18 11:39), Petr Mladek wrote: [..]
Hmm. Can't answer right now :)
Please, let me know what name you would like ;-)
:) Wow, it's hard. Maybe we can derive some bits from the ftrace_dump() function name? Dunno... Does printk_dump_nmi_enter() sound terrible?
Maybe Steven has some opinions on this?
What exactly is the question?
Which one of these you'd prefer to see in ftrace_dump():
- printk_nmi_direct_enter() / printk_nmi_direct_exit() - printk_chatty_nmi_enter() / printk_chatty_nmi_exit() - printk_large_nmi_enter() / printk_large_nmi_exit() - printk_dump_nmi_enter() / printk_dump_nmi_exit()
Also, from a previous email in this thread, if you have to risk interleaved output to solve a deadlock, then just do that.
Yep.
-ss