On 3/20/19 3:16 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 11:23:03 +0530 Souptick Joarder jrdr.linux@gmail.com wrote:
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c @@ -447,6 +447,13 @@ static inline bool queue_pages_required(struct page *page, return node_isset(nid, *qp->nmask) == !(flags & MPOL_MF_INVERT); }
+/*
- The queue_pages_pmd() may have three kind of return value.
- 1 - pages are placed on he right node or queued successfully.
Minor typo -> s/he/the ?
Yes, that comment needs some help. This?
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c~mm-mempolicy-make-mbind-return-eio-when-mpol_mf_strict-is-specified-fix +++ a/mm/mempolicy.c @@ -429,9 +429,9 @@ static inline bool queue_pages_required( } /*
- The queue_pages_pmd() may have three kind of return value.
- 1 - pages are placed on he right node or queued successfully.
- 0 - THP get split.
- queue_pages_pmd() has three possible return values:
- 1 - pages are placed on the right node or queued successfully.
*/
- 0 - THP was split.
- -EIO - is migration entry or MPOL_MF_STRICT was specified and an existing
page was already on a node that does not follow the policy.
It looks good to me. Thanks, Andrew.
Yang
_