6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jiapeng Chong jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com
[ Upstream commit 82ccdf062a64f3c4ac575c16179ce68edbbbe8e4 ]
The function is defined, but not called anywhere:
kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1880:20: warning: unused function '__hrtimer_peek_ahead_timers'.
Remove it.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot abaci@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240322070441.29646-1-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba... Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=8611 Stable-dep-of: e895f8e29119 ("hrtimers: Unconditionally update target CPU base after offline timer migration") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 20 +------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c index 6d9da768604d6..e9833a30a86a4 100644 --- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c +++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c @@ -1938,25 +1938,7 @@ void hrtimer_interrupt(struct clock_event_device *dev) tick_program_event(expires_next, 1); pr_warn_once("hrtimer: interrupt took %llu ns\n", ktime_to_ns(delta)); } - -/* called with interrupts disabled */ -static inline void __hrtimer_peek_ahead_timers(void) -{ - struct tick_device *td; - - if (!hrtimer_hres_active()) - return; - - td = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_device); - if (td && td->evtdev) - hrtimer_interrupt(td->evtdev); -} - -#else /* CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS */ - -static inline void __hrtimer_peek_ahead_timers(void) { } - -#endif /* !CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS */ +#endif /* !CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS */
/* * Called from run_local_timers in hardirq context every jiffy