qh6envvnuw45w2omvpufqtbq5k5343ymdzswxrxmczwoe64d6g@a4z5wjdbdw6w Reply-To: In-Reply-To: ah4qm66q5q7we7ykhl3uywgrexi7izdxrmfyn2zm3jhswitebt@cz2ipkdgr6yf
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 05:01:31PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
No, nothing I can think of.
Note however that the comment above vsock_close() ("Dummy callback required by sockmap. See unconditional call of saved_close() in sock_map_close().") becomes somewhat misleading :)
Yeah, we can mention in the commit description of the backport that we backport it just to reduce conflicts but sockmap features are not backported. I'd touch as less as possibile in the patch, otherwise IMHO is better to just fix the conflicts in the 2 patches.
Thanks, Stefano
Totally agree with you, will send the backport in a couple of days if nobody has any objections.
Luigi