On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 06:01:50PM +0000, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 1:11 PM To: Deucher, Alexander Alexander.Deucher@amd.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; stable@vger.kernel.org; Wentland, Harry Harry.Wentland@amd.com; Zhu, Rex Rex.Zhu@amd.com; Sasha Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.18 222/235] drm/amd/pp: Send khz clock values to DC for smu7/8
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 04:02:19PM +0000, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 10:44 AM To: Deucher, Alexander Alexander.Deucher@amd.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; stable@vger.kernel.org; Wentland, Harry Harry.Wentland@amd.com; Zhu, Rex Rex.Zhu@amd.com;
Sasha
Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.18 222/235] drm/amd/pp: Send khz clock values to DC for smu7/8
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 02:33:56PM +0000, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 7:53 AM To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; stable@vger.kernel.org; Wentland, Harry Harry.Wentland@amd.com; Deucher, Alexander Alexander.Deucher@amd.com; Zhu, Rex Rex.Zhu@amd.com;
Sasha
Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com Subject: [PATCH 4.18 222/235] drm/amd/pp: Send khz clock values to DC for smu7/8
4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
know.
This regresses power usage on 4.18. Please revert. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201275
Is it reverted in "upstream" as well? If not, please get the fix in there and then I will be glad to backport it here.
There's no breakage in upstream. This patch addressed breakages in 4.19 specifically due to some other refactoring we did in the driver. I'll try and dig out the exact series of patches this addressed.
So there is no problem in 4.19-rc7? That contridicts the statement of looking in drm-next for the fixes.
Sorry, what statement about drm-next? This patch was for 4.19 and was not intended for 4.18. It was picked up by Sasha's auto select system for stable.
I thought this thread said that.
Ok, so I should just revert it?
thanks,
greg k-h