On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 06:44:10PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
On 10/30/22 11:52, Nadav Amit wrote:
On Oct 30, 2022, at 11:43 AM, Peter Xu peterx@redhat.com wrote:
The loop comes from 7e027b14d53e ("vm: simplify unmap_vmas() calling convention", 2012-05-06), where zap_page_range() was used to replace a call to unmap_vmas() because the patch wanted to eliminate the zap details pointer for unmap_vmas(), which makes sense.
I didn't check the old code, but from what I can tell (and also as Mike pointed out) I don't think zap_page_range() in the lastest code base is ever used on multi-vma at all. Otherwise the mmu notifier is already broken - see mmu_notifier_range_init() where the vma pointer is also part of the notification.
Perhaps we should just remove the loop?
There is already zap_page_range_single() that does exactly that. Just need to export it.
I was thinking that zap_page_range() should perform a notification call for each vma within the loop. Something like this?
I'm boldly guessing what Nadav suggested was using zap_page_range_single() and export it for MADV_DONTNEED. Hopefully that's also the easiest for stable?
For the long term, I really think we should just get rid of the loop..
@@ -1704,15 +1704,21 @@ void zap_page_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, MA_STATE(mas, mt, vma->vm_end, vma->vm_end); lru_add_drain();
- mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0, vma, vma->vm_mm,
tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, vma->vm_mm); update_hiwater_rss(vma->vm_mm);start, start + size);
- mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range); do {
unmap_single_vma(&tlb, vma, start, range.end, NULL);
mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0, vma,
vma->vm_mm,
max(start, vma->vm_start),
min(start + size, vma->vm_end));
if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
adjust_range_if_pmd_sharing_possible(vma,
&range.start,
&range.end);
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
unmap_single_vma(&tlb, vma, start, start + size, NULL);
} while ((vma = mas_find(&mas, end - 1)) != NULL);mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
- mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range); tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb);
}
One thing to keep in mind is that this patch is a fix that must be backported to stable. Therefore, I do not think we want to add too many changes out of the direct scope of the fix.
We can always change things like this in follow up patches.
Mike Kravetz