From: Qian Cai cai@lca.pw
[ Upstream commit 86b18aaa2b5b5bb48e609cd591b3d2d0fdbe0442 ]
sk_buff.qlen can be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN,
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in __skb_try_recv_from_queue / unix_dgram_sendmsg
read to 0xffff8a1b1d8a81c0 of 4 bytes by task 5371 on cpu 96: unix_dgram_sendmsg+0x9a9/0xb70 include/linux/skbuff.h:1821 net/unix/af_unix.c:1761 ____sys_sendmsg+0x33e/0x370 ___sys_sendmsg+0xa6/0xf0 __sys_sendmsg+0x69/0xf0 __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x51/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb47 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
write to 0xffff8a1b1d8a81c0 of 4 bytes by task 1 on cpu 99: __skb_try_recv_from_queue+0x327/0x410 include/linux/skbuff.h:2029 __skb_try_recv_datagram+0xbe/0x220 unix_dgram_recvmsg+0xee/0x850 ____sys_recvmsg+0x1fb/0x210 ___sys_recvmsg+0xa2/0xf0 __sys_recvmsg+0x66/0xf0 __x64_sys_recvmsg+0x51/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb47 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
Since only the read is operating as lockless, it could introduce a logic bug in unix_recvq_full() due to the load tearing. Fix it by adding a lockless variant of skb_queue_len() and unix_recvq_full() where READ_ONCE() is on the read while WRITE_ONCE() is on the write similar to the commit d7d16a89350a ("net: add skb_queue_empty_lockless()").
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- include/linux/skbuff.h | 14 +++++++++++++- net/unix/af_unix.c | 11 +++++++++-- 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h index a9a764a17c289..f6fcf581ea505 100644 --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h @@ -1674,6 +1674,18 @@ static inline __u32 skb_queue_len(const struct sk_buff_head *list_) return list_->qlen; }
+/** + * skb_queue_len_lockless - get queue length + * @list_: list to measure + * + * Return the length of an &sk_buff queue. + * This variant can be used in lockless contexts. + */ +static inline __u32 skb_queue_len_lockless(const struct sk_buff_head *list_) +{ + return READ_ONCE(list_->qlen); +} + /** * __skb_queue_head_init - initialize non-spinlock portions of sk_buff_head * @list: queue to initialize @@ -1881,7 +1893,7 @@ static inline void __skb_unlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sk_buff_head *list) { struct sk_buff *next, *prev;
- list->qlen--; + WRITE_ONCE(list->qlen, list->qlen - 1); next = skb->next; prev = skb->prev; skb->next = skb->prev = NULL; diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c index 091e93798eacc..44ff3f5c22dfd 100644 --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c @@ -192,11 +192,17 @@ static inline int unix_may_send(struct sock *sk, struct sock *osk) return unix_peer(osk) == NULL || unix_our_peer(sk, osk); }
-static inline int unix_recvq_full(struct sock const *sk) +static inline int unix_recvq_full(const struct sock *sk) { return skb_queue_len(&sk->sk_receive_queue) > sk->sk_max_ack_backlog; }
+static inline int unix_recvq_full_lockless(const struct sock *sk) +{ + return skb_queue_len_lockless(&sk->sk_receive_queue) > + READ_ONCE(sk->sk_max_ack_backlog); +} + struct sock *unix_peer_get(struct sock *s) { struct sock *peer; @@ -1792,7 +1798,8 @@ restart_locked: * - unix_peer(sk) == sk by time of get but disconnected before lock */ if (other != sk && - unlikely(unix_peer(other) != sk && unix_recvq_full(other))) { + unlikely(unix_peer(other) != sk && + unix_recvq_full_lockless(other))) { if (timeo) { timeo = unix_wait_for_peer(other, timeo);