The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 7559950aef1ab8792c50797c6c5c7c5150a02460 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Suzuki K Poulose suzuki.poulose@arm.com Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 23:30:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: cpufeature: Set the FP/SIMD compat HWCAP bits properly
We set the compat_elf_hwcap bits unconditionally on arm64 to include the VFP and NEON support. However, the FP/SIMD unit is optional on Arm v8 and thus could be missing. We already handle this properly in the kernel, but still advertise to the COMPAT applications that the VFP is available. Fix this to make sure we only advertise when we really have them.
Fixes: 82e0191a1aa11abf ("arm64: Support systems without FP/ASIMD") Cc: Will Deacon will@kernel.org Cc: Mark Rutland mark.rutland@arm.com Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel ardb@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas@arm.com Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose suzuki.poulose@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon will@kernel.org
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index 2fc9f18e2d2d..c008164b0848 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -32,9 +32,7 @@ static unsigned long elf_hwcap __read_mostly; #define COMPAT_ELF_HWCAP_DEFAULT \ (COMPAT_HWCAP_HALF|COMPAT_HWCAP_THUMB|\ COMPAT_HWCAP_FAST_MULT|COMPAT_HWCAP_EDSP|\ - COMPAT_HWCAP_TLS|COMPAT_HWCAP_VFP|\ - COMPAT_HWCAP_VFPv3|COMPAT_HWCAP_VFPv4|\ - COMPAT_HWCAP_NEON|COMPAT_HWCAP_IDIV|\ + COMPAT_HWCAP_TLS|COMPAT_HWCAP_IDIV|\ COMPAT_HWCAP_LPAE) unsigned int compat_elf_hwcap __read_mostly = COMPAT_ELF_HWCAP_DEFAULT; unsigned int compat_elf_hwcap2 __read_mostly; @@ -1597,6 +1595,12 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = { .match_list = list, \ }
+#define HWCAP_CAP_MATCH(match, cap_type, cap) \ + { \ + __HWCAP_CAP(#cap, cap_type, cap) \ + .matches = match, \ + } + #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities ptr_auth_hwcap_addr_matches[] = { { @@ -1670,8 +1674,35 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_elf_hwcaps[] = { {}, };
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT +static bool compat_has_neon(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap, int scope) +{ + /* + * Check that all of MVFR1_EL1.{SIMDSP, SIMDInt, SIMDLS} are available, + * in line with that of arm32 as in vfp_init(). We make sure that the + * check is future proof, by making sure value is non-zero. + */ + u32 mvfr1; + + WARN_ON(scope == SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU && preemptible()); + if (scope == SCOPE_SYSTEM) + mvfr1 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_MVFR1_EL1); + else + mvfr1 = read_sysreg_s(SYS_MVFR1_EL1); + + return cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(mvfr1, MVFR1_SIMDSP_SHIFT) && + cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(mvfr1, MVFR1_SIMDINT_SHIFT) && + cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(mvfr1, MVFR1_SIMDLS_SHIFT); +} +#endif + static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities compat_elf_hwcaps[] = { #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT + HWCAP_CAP_MATCH(compat_has_neon, CAP_COMPAT_HWCAP, COMPAT_HWCAP_NEON), + HWCAP_CAP(SYS_MVFR1_EL1, MVFR1_SIMDFMAC_SHIFT, FTR_UNSIGNED, 1, CAP_COMPAT_HWCAP, COMPAT_HWCAP_VFPv4), + /* Arm v8 mandates MVFR0.FPDP == {0, 2}. So, piggy back on this for the presence of VFP support */ + HWCAP_CAP(SYS_MVFR0_EL1, MVFR0_FPDP_SHIFT, FTR_UNSIGNED, 2, CAP_COMPAT_HWCAP, COMPAT_HWCAP_VFP), + HWCAP_CAP(SYS_MVFR0_EL1, MVFR0_FPDP_SHIFT, FTR_UNSIGNED, 2, CAP_COMPAT_HWCAP, COMPAT_HWCAP_VFPv3), HWCAP_CAP(SYS_ID_ISAR5_EL1, ID_ISAR5_AES_SHIFT, FTR_UNSIGNED, 2, CAP_COMPAT_HWCAP2, COMPAT_HWCAP2_PMULL), HWCAP_CAP(SYS_ID_ISAR5_EL1, ID_ISAR5_AES_SHIFT, FTR_UNSIGNED, 1, CAP_COMPAT_HWCAP2, COMPAT_HWCAP2_AES), HWCAP_CAP(SYS_ID_ISAR5_EL1, ID_ISAR5_SHA1_SHIFT, FTR_UNSIGNED, 1, CAP_COMPAT_HWCAP2, COMPAT_HWCAP2_SHA1),