5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Vlad Buslov vladbu@nvidia.com
commit fb1a3132ee1ac968316e45d21a48703a6db0b6c3 upstream.
Function mlx5e_rep_neigh_update() wasn't updated to accommodate rtnl lock removal from TC filter update path and properly handle concurrent encap entry insertion/deletion which can lead to following use-after-free:
[23827.464923] ================================================================== [23827.469446] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core] [23827.470971] Read of size 4 at addr ffff8881d132228c by task kworker/u20:6/21635 [23827.472251] [23827.472615] CPU: 9 PID: 21635 Comm: kworker/u20:6 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc3+ #5 [23827.473788] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [23827.475639] Workqueue: mlx5e mlx5e_rep_neigh_update [mlx5_core] [23827.476731] Call Trace: [23827.477260] dump_stack+0xbb/0x107 [23827.477906] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x18/0x140 [23827.478896] ? mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core] [23827.479879] ? mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core] [23827.480905] kasan_report.cold+0x7c/0xd8 [23827.481701] ? mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core] [23827.482744] kasan_check_range+0x145/0x1a0 [23827.493112] mlx5e_encap_take+0x72/0x140 [mlx5_core] [23827.494054] ? mlx5e_tc_tun_encap_info_equal_generic+0x140/0x140 [mlx5_core] [23827.495296] mlx5e_rep_neigh_update+0x41e/0x5e0 [mlx5_core] [23827.496338] ? mlx5e_rep_neigh_entry_release+0xb80/0xb80 [mlx5_core] [23827.497486] ? read_word_at_a_time+0xe/0x20 [23827.498250] ? strscpy+0xa0/0x2a0 [23827.498889] process_one_work+0x8ac/0x14e0 [23827.499638] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 [23827.500537] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x2c0/0x2c0 [23827.501359] ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90 [23827.502116] worker_thread+0x53b/0x1220 [23827.502831] ? process_one_work+0x14e0/0x14e0 [23827.503627] kthread+0x328/0x3f0 [23827.504254] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x40 [23827.505065] ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x90/0x90 [23827.505912] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [23827.506621] [23827.506987] Allocated by task 28248: [23827.507694] kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 [23827.508476] __kasan_kmalloc+0x7c/0x90 [23827.509197] mlx5e_attach_encap+0xde1/0x1d40 [mlx5_core] [23827.510194] mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow+0x397/0xc40 [mlx5_core] [23827.511218] __mlx5e_add_fdb_flow+0x519/0xb30 [mlx5_core] [23827.512234] mlx5e_configure_flower+0x191c/0x4870 [mlx5_core] [23827.513298] tc_setup_cb_add+0x1d5/0x420 [23827.514023] fl_hw_replace_filter+0x382/0x6a0 [cls_flower] [23827.514975] fl_change+0x2ceb/0x4a51 [cls_flower] [23827.515821] tc_new_tfilter+0x89a/0x2070 [23827.516548] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x644/0x8c0 [23827.517300] netlink_rcv_skb+0x11d/0x340 [23827.518021] netlink_unicast+0x42b/0x700 [23827.518742] netlink_sendmsg+0x743/0xc20 [23827.519467] sock_sendmsg+0xb2/0xe0 [23827.520131] ____sys_sendmsg+0x590/0x770 [23827.520851] ___sys_sendmsg+0xd8/0x160 [23827.521552] __sys_sendmsg+0xb7/0x140 [23827.522238] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x70 [23827.522907] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [23827.523797] [23827.524163] Freed by task 25948: [23827.524780] kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 [23827.525488] kasan_set_track+0x1c/0x30 [23827.526187] kasan_set_free_info+0x20/0x30 [23827.526968] __kasan_slab_free+0xed/0x130 [23827.527709] slab_free_freelist_hook+0xcf/0x1d0 [23827.528528] kmem_cache_free_bulk+0x33a/0x6e0 [23827.529317] kfree_rcu_work+0x55f/0xb70 [23827.530024] process_one_work+0x8ac/0x14e0 [23827.530770] worker_thread+0x53b/0x1220 [23827.531480] kthread+0x328/0x3f0 [23827.532114] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [23827.532785] [23827.533147] Last potentially related work creation: [23827.534007] kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 [23827.534710] kasan_record_aux_stack+0xab/0xc0 [23827.535492] kvfree_call_rcu+0x31/0x7b0 [23827.536206] mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_flow+0x577/0xef0 [mlx5_core] [23827.537305] mlx5e_flow_put+0x49/0x80 [mlx5_core] [23827.538290] mlx5e_delete_flower+0x6d1/0xe60 [mlx5_core] [23827.539300] tc_setup_cb_destroy+0x18e/0x2f0 [23827.540144] fl_hw_destroy_filter+0x1d2/0x310 [cls_flower] [23827.541148] __fl_delete+0x4dc/0x660 [cls_flower] [23827.541985] fl_delete+0x97/0x160 [cls_flower] [23827.542782] tc_del_tfilter+0x7ab/0x13d0 [23827.543503] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x644/0x8c0 [23827.544257] netlink_rcv_skb+0x11d/0x340 [23827.544981] netlink_unicast+0x42b/0x700 [23827.545700] netlink_sendmsg+0x743/0xc20 [23827.546424] sock_sendmsg+0xb2/0xe0 [23827.547084] ____sys_sendmsg+0x590/0x770 [23827.547850] ___sys_sendmsg+0xd8/0x160 [23827.548606] __sys_sendmsg+0xb7/0x140 [23827.549303] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x70 [23827.549969] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [23827.550853] [23827.551217] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8881d1322200 [23827.551217] which belongs to the cache kmalloc-256 of size 256 [23827.553341] The buggy address is located 140 bytes inside of [23827.553341] 256-byte region [ffff8881d1322200, ffff8881d1322300) [23827.555747] The buggy address belongs to the page: [23827.556847] page:00000000898762aa refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x1d1320 [23827.558651] head:00000000898762aa order:2 compound_mapcount:0 compound_pincount:0 [23827.559961] flags: 0x2ffff800010200(slab|head|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1ffff) [23827.561243] raw: 002ffff800010200 dead000000000100 dead000000000122 ffff888100042b40 [23827.562653] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000200020 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 [23827.564112] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected [23827.565439] [23827.565932] Memory state around the buggy address: [23827.566917] ffff8881d1322180: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [23827.568485] ffff8881d1322200: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [23827.569818] >ffff8881d1322280: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [23827.571143] ^ [23827.571879] ffff8881d1322300: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [23827.573283] ffff8881d1322380: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [23827.574654] ==================================================================
Most of the necessary logic is already correctly implemented by mlx5e_get_next_valid_encap() helper that is used in neigh stats update handler. Make the handler generic by renaming it to mlx5e_get_next_matching_encap() and use callback to test whether flow is matching instead of hardcoded check for 'valid' flag value. Implement mlx5e_get_next_valid_encap() by calling mlx5e_get_next_matching_encap() with callback that tests encap MLX5_ENCAP_ENTRY_VALID flag. Implement new mlx5e_get_next_init_encap() helper by calling mlx5e_get_next_matching_encap() with callback that tests encap completion result to be non-error and use it in mlx5e_rep_neigh_update() to safely iterate over nhe->encap_list.
Remove encap completion logic from mlx5e_rep_update_flows() since the encap entries passed to this function are already guaranteed to be properly initialized by similar code in mlx5e_get_next_init_encap().
Fixes: 2a1f1768fa17 ("net/mlx5e: Refactor neigh update for concurrent execution") Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov vladbu@nvidia.com Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan roid@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed saeedm@nvidia.com [ since kernel 5.10 doesn't have commit 0d9f96471493 ("net/mlx5e: Extract tc tunnel encap/decap code to dedicated file") which moved encap/decap from en_tc.c to tc_tun_encap.c, so backport and move the additional functions to en_tc.c instead of tc_tun_encap.c ] Signed-off-by: Xiangyu Chen xiangyu.chen@windriver.com Signed-off-by: He Zhe zhe.he@windriver.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/rep/neigh.c | 17 +++----- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/rep/tc.c | 6 --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 33 +++++++++++++++-- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.h | 3 + 4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/rep/neigh.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/rep/neigh.c @@ -129,9 +129,8 @@ static void mlx5e_rep_neigh_update(struc work); struct mlx5e_neigh_hash_entry *nhe = update_work->nhe; struct neighbour *n = update_work->n; - struct mlx5e_encap_entry *e; + struct mlx5e_encap_entry *e = NULL; unsigned char ha[ETH_ALEN]; - struct mlx5e_priv *priv; bool neigh_connected; u8 nud_state, dead;
@@ -152,14 +151,12 @@ static void mlx5e_rep_neigh_update(struc
trace_mlx5e_rep_neigh_update(nhe, ha, neigh_connected);
- list_for_each_entry(e, &nhe->encap_list, encap_list) { - if (!mlx5e_encap_take(e)) - continue; - - priv = netdev_priv(e->out_dev); - mlx5e_rep_update_flows(priv, e, neigh_connected, ha); - mlx5e_encap_put(priv, e); - } + /* mlx5e_get_next_init_encap() releases previous encap before returning + * the next one. + */ + while ((e = mlx5e_get_next_init_encap(nhe, e)) != NULL) + mlx5e_rep_update_flows(netdev_priv(e->out_dev), e, neigh_connected, ha); + rtnl_unlock(); mlx5e_release_neigh_update_work(update_work); } --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/rep/tc.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/rep/tc.c @@ -91,13 +91,9 @@ void mlx5e_rep_update_flows(struct mlx5e
ASSERT_RTNL();
- /* wait for encap to be fully initialized */ - wait_for_completion(&e->res_ready); - mutex_lock(&esw->offloads.encap_tbl_lock); encap_connected = !!(e->flags & MLX5_ENCAP_ENTRY_VALID); - if (e->compl_result < 0 || (encap_connected == neigh_connected && - ether_addr_equal(e->h_dest, ha))) + if (encap_connected == neigh_connected && ether_addr_equal(e->h_dest, ha)) goto unlock;
mlx5e_take_all_encap_flows(e, &flow_list); --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c @@ -1653,9 +1653,12 @@ void mlx5e_put_encap_flow_list(struct ml mlx5e_flow_put(priv, flow); }
+typedef bool (match_cb)(struct mlx5e_encap_entry *); + static struct mlx5e_encap_entry * -mlx5e_get_next_valid_encap(struct mlx5e_neigh_hash_entry *nhe, - struct mlx5e_encap_entry *e) +mlx5e_get_next_matching_encap(struct mlx5e_neigh_hash_entry *nhe, + struct mlx5e_encap_entry *e, + match_cb match) { struct mlx5e_encap_entry *next = NULL;
@@ -1690,7 +1693,7 @@ retry: /* wait for encap to be fully initialized */ wait_for_completion(&next->res_ready); /* continue searching if encap entry is not in valid state after completion */ - if (!(next->flags & MLX5_ENCAP_ENTRY_VALID)) { + if (!match(next)) { e = next; goto retry; } @@ -1698,6 +1701,30 @@ retry: return next; }
+static bool mlx5e_encap_valid(struct mlx5e_encap_entry *e) +{ + return e->flags & MLX5_ENCAP_ENTRY_VALID; +} + +static struct mlx5e_encap_entry * +mlx5e_get_next_valid_encap(struct mlx5e_neigh_hash_entry *nhe, + struct mlx5e_encap_entry *e) +{ + return mlx5e_get_next_matching_encap(nhe, e, mlx5e_encap_valid); +} + +static bool mlx5e_encap_initialized(struct mlx5e_encap_entry *e) +{ + return e->compl_result >= 0; +} + +struct mlx5e_encap_entry * +mlx5e_get_next_init_encap(struct mlx5e_neigh_hash_entry *nhe, + struct mlx5e_encap_entry *e) +{ + return mlx5e_get_next_matching_encap(nhe, e, mlx5e_encap_initialized); +} + void mlx5e_tc_update_neigh_used_value(struct mlx5e_neigh_hash_entry *nhe) { struct mlx5e_neigh *m_neigh = &nhe->m_neigh; --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.h +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.h @@ -161,6 +161,9 @@ void mlx5e_take_all_encap_flows(struct m void mlx5e_put_encap_flow_list(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct list_head *flow_list);
struct mlx5e_neigh_hash_entry; +struct mlx5e_encap_entry * +mlx5e_get_next_init_encap(struct mlx5e_neigh_hash_entry *nhe, + struct mlx5e_encap_entry *e); void mlx5e_tc_update_neigh_used_value(struct mlx5e_neigh_hash_entry *nhe);
void mlx5e_tc_reoffload_flows_work(struct work_struct *work);