On 9/2/25 7:42 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 02:15:24PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
Commit 31272abd5974b38ba312e9cf2ec2f09f9dd7dcba upstream. Commit f3f9deccfc68a6b7c8c1cc51e902edba23d309d4 LTS
How about you just backport both of these independently, as this change now looks nothing like either of those commits :(
The trouble is that the first one was already backported by c334ae4a545a1b1ae8aff4e5eb741af2c7624cc7 and it missed a few things. Some, but not all, of these issues were corrected by the LTS patch (the second commit above).
I couldn't figure out how to separate this into two patches so I merged them into one.
I suppose I could provide an incomplete "fix" for c334ae4a545a1b1ae8aff4e5eb741af2c7624cc7 as a separate patch (but the code will still be broken) and then do the LTS backport.
Or I can drop these two lines and simply mention these two commits inline in the commit message.
-boris