6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi krisman@suse.de
[ Upstream commit cd72c7ef5fed44272272a105b1da22810c91be69 ]
Even though it seems to be able to resolve some names of case-insensitive directories, the lack of d_hash and d_compare means we end up with a broken state in the d_cache. Considering it was never a goal to support these two together, and we are preparing to use d_revalidate in case-insensitive filesystems, which would make the combination even more broken, reject any attempt to get a casefolded inode from ecryptfs.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi krisman@suse.de Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- fs/ecryptfs/inode.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c index c214fe0981bd..55340ac61456 100644 --- a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c @@ -76,6 +76,14 @@ static struct inode *__ecryptfs_get_inode(struct inode *lower_inode,
if (lower_inode->i_sb != ecryptfs_superblock_to_lower(sb)) return ERR_PTR(-EXDEV); + + /* Reject dealing with casefold directories. */ + if (IS_CASEFOLDED(lower_inode)) { + pr_err_ratelimited("%s: Can't handle casefolded directory.\n", + __func__); + return ERR_PTR(-EREMOTE); + } + if (!igrab(lower_inode)) return ERR_PTR(-ESTALE); inode = iget5_locked(sb, (unsigned long)lower_inode,