5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Beleswar Padhi b-padhi@ti.com
commit 1dc7242f6ee0c99852cb90676d7fe201cf5de422 upstream.
In case of errors during core start operation from sysfs, the driver directly returns with the -EPERM error code. Fix this to ensure that mailbox channels are freed on error before returning by jumping to the 'put_mbox' error handling label. Similarly, jump to the 'out' error handling label to return with required -EPERM error code during the core stop operation from sysfs.
Fixes: 3c8a9066d584 ("remoteproc: k3-r5: Do not allow core1 to power up before core0 via sysfs") Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi b-padhi@ti.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240506141849.1735679-1-b-padhi@ti.com Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier mathieu.poirier@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c @@ -484,7 +484,8 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_start(struct rpro if (core != core0 && core0->rproc->state == RPROC_OFFLINE) { dev_err(dev, "%s: can not start core 1 before core 0\n", __func__); - return -EPERM; + ret = -EPERM; + goto put_mbox; }
ret = k3_r5_core_run(core); @@ -547,7 +548,8 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc if (core != core1 && core1->rproc->state != RPROC_OFFLINE) { dev_err(dev, "%s: can not stop core 0 before core 1\n", __func__); - return -EPERM; + ret = -EPERM; + goto out; }
ret = k3_r5_core_halt(core);