On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 07:59:32PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Tue 2019-10-29 19:02:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 05:24:19PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.81 release. There are 93 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Tue 29 Oct 2019 08:27:02 PM UTC. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:19:29 +0100 From: Greg KH gregkh@linuxfoundation.org To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Linux 4.19.81
[-- The following data is signed --]
I'm announcing the release of the 4.19.81 kernel.
All users of the 4.19 kernel series must upgrade.
Am I confused or was the 4.19.81 released a bit early?
I said: Responses should be made by Tue 29 Oct 2019 08:27:02 PM UTC.
And I released at: Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:19:29 +0100
So really, I was a few minutes late :)
I'm confused. You said "by Tue ... 08:27:02 PM UTC". That 8 PM is 20h, but did the release on 10h GMT+1, or 9h UTC -- 9 AM.... so like 11 hours early, if I got the timezones right.
Does PM mean something else in the above context?
Ugh, no, you are right, I was ignoring the PM thing, I thought the -u option to date would give me a 24 hour date string, and so I thought that was 8:27 in the morning.
Let me mess around with 'date' to see if I can come up with a better string to use here. I guess: date --rfc-3339=seconds -u would probably be best?
thanks,
greg k-h