From: Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com
[ Upstream commit 3d1e5039f5f87a8731202ceca08764ee7cb010d3 ]
For some reason I missed the case of DCCP passive flows in my previous patch.
Fixes: a904a0693c18 ("inet: stop leaking jiffies on the wire") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com Reported-by: Thiemo Nagel tnagel@google.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- net/dccp/ipv4.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/dccp/ipv4.c +++ b/net/dccp/ipv4.c @@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ struct sock *dccp_v4_request_recv_sock(c RCU_INIT_POINTER(newinet->inet_opt, rcu_dereference(ireq->ireq_opt)); newinet->mc_index = inet_iif(skb); newinet->mc_ttl = ip_hdr(skb)->ttl; - newinet->inet_id = jiffies; + newinet->inet_id = prandom_u32();
if (dst == NULL && (dst = inet_csk_route_child_sock(sk, newsk, req)) == NULL) goto put_and_exit;