3 Oct
2018
3 Oct
'18
7:54 a.m.
Hi Miquel,
On 3/10/2018 9:33 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
Yes! That seems to work nicely as a replacement for my patch.
Chris, how is that going on your board?
Looks good to me. I've just re-run stress_{1,2,3} on the custom board and DB-88F6820-AMC.
Great! There is still something weird about the complete() though.
Daniel, do you plan to send the above change or do you want me to do it? I would like to integrate the fix in nand/next before sending the PR.
Nah, your version has barely anything to do with my patch anymore, except that it fixes the same effect, so go ahead please :)
You can add my Reported-and-tested-by though.
Thanks for chasing this, everyone!
Daniel