Hi
Am 03.06.25 um 13:45 schrieb Simona Vetter:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 05:15:58PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 28.05.25 um 11:12 schrieb Simona Vetter:
Object creation is a careful dance where we must guarantee that the object is fully constructed before it is visible to other threads, and GEM buffer objects are no difference.
Final publishing happens by calling drm_gem_handle_create(). After that the only allowed thing to do is call drm_gem_object_put() because a concurrent call to the GEM_CLOSE ioctl with a correctly guessed id (which is trivial since we have a linear allocator) can already tear down the object again.
Luckily most drivers get this right, the very few exceptions I've pinged the relevant maintainers for. Unfortunately we also need drm_gem_handle_create() when creating additional handles for an already existing object (e.g. GETFB ioctl or the various bo import ioctl), and hence we cannot have a drm_gem_handle_create_and_put() as the only exported function to stop these issues from happening.
Now unfortunately the implementation of drm_gem_handle_create() isn't living up to standards: It does correctly finishe object initialization at the global level, and hence is safe against a concurrent tear down. But it also sets up the file-private aspects of the handle, and that part goes wrong: We fully register the object in the drm_file.object_idr before calling drm_vma_node_allow() or obj->funcs->open, which opens up races against concurrent removal of that handle in drm_gem_handle_delete().
Fix this with the usual two-stage approach of first reserving the handle id, and then only registering the object after we've completed the file-private setup.
Jacek reported this with a testcase of concurrently calling GEM_CLOSE on a freshly-created object (which also destroys the object), but it should be possible to hit this with just additional handles created through import or GETFB without completed destroying the underlying object with the concurrent GEM_CLOSE ioctl calls.
Note that the close-side of this race was fixed in f6cd7daecff5 ("drm: Release driver references to handle before making it available again"), which means a cool 9 years have passed until someone noticed that we need to make this symmetry or there's still gaps left :-/ Without the 2-stage close approach we'd still have a race, therefore that's an integral part of this bugfix.
More importantly, this means we can have NULL pointers behind allocated id in our drm_file.object_idr. We need to check for that now:
drm_gem_handle_delete() checks for ERR_OR_NULL already
drm_gem.c:object_lookup() also chekcs for NULL
drm_gem_release() should never be called if there's another thread still existing that could call into an IOCTL that creates a new handle, so cannot race. For paranoia I added a NULL check to drm_gem_object_release_handle() though.
most drivers (etnaviv, i915, msm) are find because they use idr_find, which maps both ENOENT and NULL to NULL.
vmgfx is already broken vmw_debugfs_gem_info_show() because NULL pointers might exist due to drm_gem_handle_delete(). This needs a separate patch. This is because idr_for_each_entry terminates on the first NULL entry and so might not iterate over everything.
similar for amd in amdgpu_debugfs_gem_info_show() and amdgpu_gem_force_release(). The latter is really questionable though since it's a best effort hack and there's no way to close all the races. Needs separate patches.
xe is really broken because it not uses idr_for_each_entry() but also drops the drm_file.table_lock, which can wreak the idr iterator state if you're unlucky enough. Maybe another reason to look into the drm fdinfo memory stats instead of hand-rolling too much.
drm_show_memory_stats() is also broken since it uses idr_for_each_entry. But since that's a preexisting bug I'll follow up with a separate patch.
Reported-by: Jacek Lawrynowicz jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jacek Lawrynowicz jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com Cc: Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Cc: Maxime Ripard mripard@kernel.org Cc: Thomas Zimmermann tzimmermann@suse.de Cc: David Airlie airlied@gmail.com Cc: Simona Vetter simona@ffwll.ch Signed-off-by: Simona Vetter simona.vetter@intel.com Signed-off-by: Simona Vetter simona.vetter@ffwll.ch
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 10 +++++++++- include/drm/drm_file.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c index 1e659d2660f7..e4e20dda47b1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c @@ -279,6 +279,9 @@ drm_gem_object_release_handle(int id, void *ptr, void *data) struct drm_file *file_priv = data; struct drm_gem_object *obj = ptr;
- if (WARN_ON(!data))
return 0;- if (obj->funcs->close) obj->funcs->close(obj, file_priv);
@@ -399,7 +402,7 @@ drm_gem_handle_create_tail(struct drm_file *file_priv, idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL); spin_lock(&file_priv->table_lock);
- ret = idr_alloc(&file_priv->object_idr, obj, 1, 0, GFP_NOWAIT);
- ret = idr_alloc(&file_priv->object_idr, NULL, 1, 0, GFP_NOWAIT); spin_unlock(&file_priv->table_lock); idr_preload_end();
@@ -420,6 +423,11 @@ drm_gem_handle_create_tail(struct drm_file *file_priv, goto err_revoke; }
- /* mirrors drm_gem_handle_delete to avoid races */
- spin_lock(&file_priv->table_lock);
- obj = idr_replace(&file_priv->object_idr, obj, handle);
- WARN_ON(obj != NULL);
A DRM print function would be preferable. The obj here is an errno pointer. Should the errno code be part of the error message?
If it fails, why does the function still succeed?
This is an internal error that should never happen, at that point just bailing out is the way to go.
Also note that the error code here is just to satisfy the function signature that id_for_each expects, we don't look at it ever (since if there's no bugs, it should never fail). I learned this because I actually removed the int return value and stuff didn't compile :-)
I see.
I can use drm_WARN_ON if you want me to though?
If you use drm_WARN_ON, you can add
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann tzimmermann@suse.de
Best regards Thomas
I'll also explain this in the commit message for the next round. -Sima
Best regards Thomas
- spin_unlock(&file_priv->table_lock); *handlep = handle; return 0;
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_file.h b/include/drm/drm_file.h index 5c3b2aa3e69d..d344d41e6cfe 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm_file.h +++ b/include/drm/drm_file.h @@ -300,6 +300,9 @@ struct drm_file { * * Mapping of mm object handles to object pointers. Used by the GEM * subsystem. Protected by @table_lock.
** Note that allocated entries might be NULL as a transient state when* creating or deleting a handle.--
Thomas Zimmermann Graphics Driver Developer SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)