On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 04:09:16PM +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
I was not aware of cpu_feature_enabled() and it makes perfect sense to use it here.
It is no difference what the callers use - we simply want to unify the interfaces and not have boot_cpu* and cpu_feature_* and so on. One is enough and we want to use cpu_feature_enabled() everywhere possible.
Thx.