6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Naohiro Aota naohiro.aota@wdc.com
[ Upstream commit 0d703963d297964451783e1a0688ebdf74cd6151 ]
The hint block group selection in the extent allocator is wrong in the first place, as it can select the dedicated data relocation block group for the normal data allocation.
Since we separated the normal data space_info and the data relocation space_info, we can easily identify a block group is for data relocation or not. Do not choose it for the normal data allocation.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota naohiro.aota@wdc.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index bb3602059906d..7bab2512468d5 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -4299,7 +4299,8 @@ static int prepare_allocation_clustered(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, }
static int prepare_allocation_zoned(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, - struct find_free_extent_ctl *ffe_ctl) + struct find_free_extent_ctl *ffe_ctl, + struct btrfs_space_info *space_info) { if (ffe_ctl->for_treelog) { spin_lock(&fs_info->treelog_bg_lock); @@ -4323,6 +4324,7 @@ static int prepare_allocation_zoned(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 avail = block_group->zone_capacity - block_group->alloc_offset;
if (block_group_bits(block_group, ffe_ctl->flags) && + block_group->space_info == space_info && avail >= ffe_ctl->num_bytes) { ffe_ctl->hint_byte = block_group->start; break; @@ -4344,7 +4346,7 @@ static int prepare_allocation(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, return prepare_allocation_clustered(fs_info, ffe_ctl, space_info, ins); case BTRFS_EXTENT_ALLOC_ZONED: - return prepare_allocation_zoned(fs_info, ffe_ctl); + return prepare_allocation_zoned(fs_info, ffe_ctl, space_info); default: BUG(); }