From: Pratik Rajesh Sampat psampat@linux.ibm.com
[ Upstream commit d95fe371ecd28901f11256c610b988ed44e36ee2 ]
The patch avoids allocating cpufreq_policy on stack hence fixing frame size overflow in 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn'
Fixes: 227942809b52 ("cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling") Signed-off-by: Pratik Rajesh Sampat psampat@linux.ibm.com Reviewed-by: Daniel Axtens dja@axtens.net Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman mpe@ellerman.id.au Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200316135743.57735-1-psampat@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c index 25c9a6cdd8614..dc81fc2bf8015 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c @@ -864,6 +864,7 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = { void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work) { struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle); + struct cpufreq_policy *policy; unsigned int cpu; cpumask_t mask;
@@ -878,12 +879,14 @@ void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work) chip->restore = false; for_each_cpu(cpu, &mask) { int index; - struct cpufreq_policy policy;
- cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu); - index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(&policy, policy.cur); - powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index); - cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy.cpus); + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); + if (!policy) + continue; + index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(policy, policy->cur); + powernv_cpufreq_target_index(policy, index); + cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy->cpus); + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); } out: put_online_cpus();