On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 08:17:57AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 06:51:52PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 03:58:49PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 07:26:16PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
We're going to want different behavior for skl/glk vs. icl in .color_commit_noarm(), so split the hook into two. Arguably we already had slightly different behaviour since csc_enable/gamma_enable are never set on icl+, so the old code was perhaps a bit confusing as well.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v5.19+ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 05ca98523481: drm/i915: Use _MMIO_PIPE() for SKL_BOTTOM_COLOR Cc: Manasi Navare navaremanasi@google.com Cc: Drew Davenport ddavenport@chromium.org Cc: Imre Deak imre.deak@intel.com Cc: Jouni Högander jouni.hogander@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230320095438.17328-2-ville.s... Reviewed-by: Imre Deak imre.deak@intel.com (cherry picked from commit f161eb01f50ab31f2084975b43bce54b7b671e17) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula jani.nikula@intel.com (cherry picked from commit 76b767d4d1cd052e455cf18e06929e8b2b70101d)
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
This commit breaks the build.
You did cherry pick all the dependencies I listed?
Nope! When you send a patch series, I had assumed that it was self-contained :(
I can do that in the future if it's preferred. But that does seem to imply that there's no point in even listing the dependencies.
Hmm, I suppose it can still be useful if one manages to list the dependencies in the original commit. But generating such a list upfront (accounting each relevant stable branch) doesn't seem particularly appetizing for a fast moving target like i915.