6.7-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Marek Szyprowski m.szyprowski@samsung.com
[ Upstream commit d2399501c2c081eac703ca9597ceb83c7875a537 ]
Commit 0499a78369ad ("ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase supported CPUs to 512") changed the handling of cpumasks on ARM 64bit, what resulted in the strange issues and warnings during cpufreq-dt initialization on some big.LITTLE platforms.
This was caused by mixing OPPs between big and LITTLE cores, because OPP-sharing information between big and LITTLE cores is computed on cpumask, which in turn was not zeroed on allocation. Fix this by switching to zalloc_cpumask_var() call.
Fixes: dc279ac6e5b4 ("cpufreq: dt: Refactor initialization to handle probe deferral properly") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.10+ Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski m.szyprowski@samsung.com Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter (Ampere) cl@linux.com Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole d-gole@ti.com Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c index 8bd6e5e8f121c..2d83bbc65dd0b 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static int dt_cpufreq_early_init(struct device *dev, int cpu) if (!priv) return -ENOMEM;
- if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&priv->cpus, GFP_KERNEL)) + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&priv->cpus, GFP_KERNEL)) return -ENOMEM;
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, priv->cpus);