6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Luo Gengkun luogengkun@huaweicloud.com
[ Upstream commit 3172fb986666dfb71bf483b6d3539e1e587fa197 ]
There may be concurrency between perf_cgroup_switch and perf_cgroup_event_disable. Consider the following scenario: after a new perf cgroup event is created on CPU0, the new event may not trigger a reprogramming, causing ctx->is_active to be 0. In this case, when CPU1 disables this perf event, it executes __perf_remove_from_context-> list _del_event->perf_cgroup_event_disable on CPU1, which causes a race with perf_cgroup_switch running on CPU0.
The following describes the details of this concurrency scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
perf_cgroup_switch: ... # cpuctx->cgrp is not NULL here if (READ_ONCE(cpuctx->cgrp) == NULL) return;
perf_remove_from_context: ... raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock); ... # ctx->is_active == 0 because reprogramm is not # tigger, so CPU1 can do __perf_remove_from_context # for CPU0 __perf_remove_from_context: perf_cgroup_event_disable: ... if (--ctx->nr_cgroups) ...
# this warning will happened because CPU1 changed # ctx.nr_cgroups to 0. WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuctx->ctx.nr_cgroups == 0);
[peterz: use guard instead of goto unlock] Fixes: db4a835601b7 ("perf/core: Set cgroup in CPU contexts for new cgroup events") Signed-off-by: Luo Gengkun luogengkun@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250604033924.3914647-3-luogengkun@huaweicloud.co... Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- kernel/events/core.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index 3389a5a2724df..7210104b3345c 100644 --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -206,6 +206,19 @@ static void perf_ctx_unlock(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx, __perf_ctx_unlock(&cpuctx->ctx); }
+typedef struct { + struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx; + struct perf_event_context *ctx; +} class_perf_ctx_lock_t; + +static inline void class_perf_ctx_lock_destructor(class_perf_ctx_lock_t *_T) +{ perf_ctx_unlock(_T->cpuctx, _T->ctx); } + +static inline class_perf_ctx_lock_t +class_perf_ctx_lock_constructor(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx, + struct perf_event_context *ctx) +{ perf_ctx_lock(cpuctx, ctx); return (class_perf_ctx_lock_t){ cpuctx, ctx }; } + #define TASK_TOMBSTONE ((void *)-1L)
static bool is_kernel_event(struct perf_event *event) @@ -898,7 +911,13 @@ static void perf_cgroup_switch(struct task_struct *task) if (READ_ONCE(cpuctx->cgrp) == cgrp) return;
- perf_ctx_lock(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx); + guard(perf_ctx_lock)(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx); + /* + * Re-check, could've raced vs perf_remove_from_context(). + */ + if (READ_ONCE(cpuctx->cgrp) == NULL) + return; + perf_ctx_disable(&cpuctx->ctx, true);
ctx_sched_out(&cpuctx->ctx, NULL, EVENT_ALL|EVENT_CGROUP); @@ -916,7 +935,6 @@ static void perf_cgroup_switch(struct task_struct *task) ctx_sched_in(&cpuctx->ctx, NULL, EVENT_ALL|EVENT_CGROUP);
perf_ctx_enable(&cpuctx->ctx, true); - perf_ctx_unlock(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx); }
static int perf_cgroup_ensure_storage(struct perf_event *event,