5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jann Horn jannh@google.com
commit 1013af4f585fccc4d3e5c5824d174de2257f7d6d upstream.
huge_pmd_unshare() drops a reference on a page table that may have previously been shared across processes, potentially turning it into a normal page table used in another process in which unrelated VMAs can afterwards be installed.
If this happens in the middle of a concurrent gup_fast(), gup_fast() could end up walking the page tables of another process. While I don't see any way in which that immediately leads to kernel memory corruption, it is really weird and unexpected.
Fix it with an explicit broadcast IPI through tlb_remove_table_sync_one(), just like we do in khugepaged when removing page tables for a THP collapse.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250528-hugetlb-fixes-splitrace-v2-2-1329349bad1a... Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250527-hugetlb-fixes-splitrace-v1-2-f4136f5ec58a... Fixes: 39dde65c9940 ("[PATCH] shared page table for hugetlb page") Signed-off-by: Jann Horn jannh@google.com Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com Cc: Liam Howlett liam.howlett@oracle.com Cc: Muchun Song muchun.song@linux.dev Cc: Oscar Salvador osalvador@suse.de Cc: Vlastimil Babka vbabka@suse.cz Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- mm/hugetlb.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -5488,6 +5488,13 @@ int huge_pmd_unshare(struct mm_struct *m return 0;
pud_clear(pud); + /* + * Once our caller drops the rmap lock, some other process might be + * using this page table as a normal, non-hugetlb page table. + * Wait for pending gup_fast() in other threads to finish before letting + * that happen. + */ + tlb_remove_table_sync_one(); atomic_dec(&virt_to_page(ptep)->pt_share_count); mm_dec_nr_pmds(mm); /*