4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com
[ Upstream commit d4dfc0f4d39475ccbbac947880b5464a74c30b99 ]
When doing an incremental send of a filesystem with the no-holes feature enabled, we end up issuing a write operation when using the no data mode send flag, instead of issuing an update extent operation. Fix this by issuing the update extent operation instead.
Trivial reproducer:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f -O no-holes /dev/sdc $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/sdc $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt/sdd
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 32K" /mnt/sdc/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdc /mnt/sdc/snap1
$ xfs_io -c "fpunch 8K 8K" /mnt/sdc/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdc /mnt/sdc/snap2
$ btrfs send /mnt/sdc/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt/sdd $ btrfs send --no-data -p /mnt/sdc/snap1 /mnt/sdc/snap2 \ | btrfs receive -vv /mnt/sdd
Before this change the output of the second receive command is:
receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=f6922049-8c22-e544-9ff9-fc6755918447... utimes write foobar, offset 8192, len 8192 utimes foobar BTRFS_IOC_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL uuid=f6922049-8c22-e544-9ff9-...
After this change it is:
receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=564d36a3-ebc8-7343-aec9-bf6fda278e64... utimes update_extent foobar: offset=8192, len=8192 utimes foobar BTRFS_IOC_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL uuid=564d36a3-ebc8-7343-aec9-bf6fda278e64...
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/btrfs/send.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/btrfs/send.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/send.c @@ -4822,6 +4822,9 @@ static int send_hole(struct send_ctx *sc u64 len; int ret = 0;
+ if (sctx->flags & BTRFS_SEND_FLAG_NO_FILE_DATA) + return send_update_extent(sctx, offset, end - offset); + p = fs_path_alloc(); if (!p) return -ENOMEM;