5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Guoqing Jiang guoqing.jiang@linux.dev
[ Upstream commit bee024d20451e4ce04ea30099cad09f7f75d288b ]
We need to print num_sle first then pbl->max_buf per the condition. Also replace mem->pbl with pbl while at it.
Fixes: 303ae1cdfdf7 ("rdma/siw: application interface") Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang guoqing.jiang@linux.dev Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230821133255.31111-3-guoqing.jiang@linux.dev Acked-by: Bernard Metzler bmt@zurich.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky leon@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c index d043793ff0f53..1d4e0dc550e42 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c @@ -1487,7 +1487,7 @@ int siw_map_mr_sg(struct ib_mr *base_mr, struct scatterlist *sl, int num_sle,
if (pbl->max_buf < num_sle) { siw_dbg_mem(mem, "too many SGE's: %d > %d\n", - mem->pbl->max_buf, num_sle); + num_sle, pbl->max_buf); return -ENOMEM; } for_each_sg(sl, slp, num_sle, i) {