6.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com
[ Upstream commit 878dbfc12cc52b17d79d205560c0fafcf5332b13 ]
Instead of explaining trivia to everyone who can read C describe the higher-level effect of setting pc->period_cycles[pwm->hwpwm] to zero.
Fixes: 01b2d4536f02 ("pwm: pwm-tiehrpwm: Fix conflicting channel period setting") Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4c38dd119a77d7017115318a3f2c50bde62a6f21.175492768... Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König ukleinek@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.c index 5e674a7bbf3be..a94b1e387b924 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.c @@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ static void ehrpwm_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) { struct ehrpwm_pwm_chip *pc = to_ehrpwm_pwm_chip(chip);
- /* set period value to zero on free */ + /* Don't let a pwm without consumer block requests to the other channel */ pc->period_cycles[pwm->hwpwm] = 0; }