4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Doron Roberts-Kedes doronrk@fb.com
[ Upstream commit 977c7114ebda2e746a114840d3a875e0cdb826fb ]
On receving an incomplete message, the existing code stores the remaining length of the cloned skb in the early_eaten field instead of incrementing the value returned by __strp_recv. This defers invocation of sock_rfree for the current skb until the next invocation of __strp_recv, which returns early_eaten if early_eaten is non-zero.
This behavior causes a stall when the current message occupies the very tail end of a massive skb, and strp_peek/need_bytes indicates that the remainder of the current message has yet to arrive on the socket. The TCP receive buffer is totally full, causing the TCP window to go to zero, so the remainder of the message will never arrive.
Incrementing the value returned by __strp_recv by the amount otherwise stored in early_eaten prevents stalls of this nature.
Signed-off-by: Doron Roberts-Kedes doronrk@fb.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- net/strparser/strparser.c | 17 +---------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
--- a/net/strparser/strparser.c +++ b/net/strparser/strparser.c @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ struct _strp_msg { */ struct strp_msg strp; int accum_len; - int early_eaten; };
static inline struct _strp_msg *_strp_msg(struct sk_buff *skb) @@ -115,20 +114,6 @@ static int __strp_recv(read_descriptor_t head = strp->skb_head; if (head) { /* Message already in progress */ - - stm = _strp_msg(head); - if (unlikely(stm->early_eaten)) { - /* Already some number of bytes on the receive sock - * data saved in skb_head, just indicate they - * are consumed. - */ - eaten = orig_len <= stm->early_eaten ? - orig_len : stm->early_eaten; - stm->early_eaten -= eaten; - - return eaten; - } - if (unlikely(orig_offset)) { /* Getting data with a non-zero offset when a message is * in progress is not expected. If it does happen, we @@ -297,9 +282,9 @@ static int __strp_recv(read_descriptor_t }
stm->accum_len += cand_len; + eaten += cand_len; strp->need_bytes = stm->strp.full_len - stm->accum_len; - stm->early_eaten = cand_len; STRP_STATS_ADD(strp->stats.bytes, cand_len); desc->count = 0; /* Stop reading socket */ break;