4.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Olga Kornievskaia olga.kornievskaia@gmail.com
[ Upstream commit 93b7f7ad2018d2037559b1d0892417864c78b371 ]
Currently, when IO to DS fails, client returns the layout and retries against the MDS. However, then on umounting (inode eviction) it returns the layout again.
This is because pnfs_return_layout() was changed in commit d78471d32bb6 ("pnfs/blocklayout: set PNFS_LAYOUTRETURN_ON_ERROR") to always set NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_REQUESTED so even if we returned the layout, it will be returned again. Instead, let's also check if we have already marked the layout invalid.
Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia kolga@netapp.com Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c @@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ _pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *ino) LIST_HEAD(tmp_list); nfs4_stateid stateid; int status = 0; - bool send; + bool send, valid_layout;
dprintk("NFS: %s for inode %lu\n", __func__, ino->i_ino);
@@ -1165,6 +1165,7 @@ _pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *ino) goto out_put_layout_hdr; spin_lock(&ino->i_lock); } + valid_layout = pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo); pnfs_clear_layoutcommit(ino, &tmp_list); pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_invalid(lo, &tmp_list, NULL, 0);
@@ -1178,7 +1179,8 @@ _pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *ino) }
/* Don't send a LAYOUTRETURN if list was initially empty */ - if (!test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_REQUESTED, &lo->plh_flags)) { + if (!test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_REQUESTED, &lo->plh_flags) || + !valid_layout) { spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock); dprintk("NFS: %s no layout segments to return\n", __func__); goto out_put_layout_hdr;