6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Pierre Gondois pierre.gondois@arm.com
[ Upstream commit 1c10941e34c5fdc0357e46a25bd130d9cf40b925 ]
The following BUG was triggered:
============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.12.0-rc2-XXX #406 Not tainted ----------------------------- kworker/1:1/62 is trying to lock: ffffff8801593030 (&cpc_ptr->rmw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpc_write+0xcc/0x370 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 2 locks held by kworker/1:1/62: #0: ffffff897ef5ec98 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2c/0x50 #1: ffffff880154e238 (&sg_policy->update_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: sugov_update_shared+0x3c/0x280 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-g9654bd3e8806 #406 Workqueue: 0x0 (events) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0xa4/0x130 show_stack+0x20/0x38 dump_stack_lvl+0x90/0xd0 dump_stack+0x18/0x28 __lock_acquire+0x480/0x1ad8 lock_acquire+0x114/0x310 _raw_spin_lock+0x50/0x70 cpc_write+0xcc/0x370 cppc_set_perf+0xa0/0x3a8 cppc_cpufreq_fast_switch+0x40/0xc0 cpufreq_driver_fast_switch+0x4c/0x218 sugov_update_shared+0x234/0x280 update_load_avg+0x6ec/0x7b8 dequeue_entities+0x108/0x830 dequeue_task_fair+0x58/0x408 __schedule+0x4f0/0x1070 schedule+0x54/0x130 worker_thread+0xc0/0x2e8 kthread+0x130/0x148 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
sugov_update_shared() locks a raw_spinlock while cpc_write() locks a spinlock.
To have a correct wait-type order, update rmw_lock to a raw spinlock and ensure that interrupts will be disabled on the CPU holding it.
Fixes: 60949b7b8054 ("ACPI: CPPC: Fix MASK_VAL() usage") Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois pierre.gondois@arm.com Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241028125657.1271512-1-pierre.gondois@arm.com [ rjw: Changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 9 +++++---- include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c index 5df417626fd10..26d1beec99137 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c @@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr)
/* Store CPU Logical ID */ cpc_ptr->cpu_id = pr->id; - spin_lock_init(&cpc_ptr->rmw_lock); + raw_spin_lock_init(&cpc_ptr->rmw_lock);
/* Parse PSD data for this CPU */ ret = acpi_get_psd(cpc_ptr, handle); @@ -1083,6 +1083,7 @@ static int cpc_write(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 val) int pcc_ss_id = per_cpu(cpu_pcc_subspace_idx, cpu); struct cpc_reg *reg = ®_res->cpc_entry.reg; struct cpc_desc *cpc_desc; + unsigned long flags;
size = GET_BIT_WIDTH(reg);
@@ -1122,7 +1123,7 @@ static int cpc_write(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 val) return -ENODEV; }
- spin_lock(&cpc_desc->rmw_lock); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpc_desc->rmw_lock, flags); switch (size) { case 8: prev_val = readb_relaxed(vaddr); @@ -1137,7 +1138,7 @@ static int cpc_write(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 val) prev_val = readq_relaxed(vaddr); break; default: - spin_unlock(&cpc_desc->rmw_lock); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpc_desc->rmw_lock, flags); return -EFAULT; } val = MASK_VAL_WRITE(reg, prev_val, val); @@ -1170,7 +1171,7 @@ static int cpc_write(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 val) }
if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY) - spin_unlock(&cpc_desc->rmw_lock); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpc_desc->rmw_lock, flags);
return ret_val; } diff --git a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h index e1720d9306669..a451ca4c207bb 100644 --- a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h +++ b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ struct cpc_desc { int write_cmd_status; int write_cmd_id; /* Lock used for RMW operations in cpc_write() */ - spinlock_t rmw_lock; + raw_spinlock_t rmw_lock; struct cpc_register_resource cpc_regs[MAX_CPC_REG_ENT]; struct acpi_psd_package domain_info; struct kobject kobj;