4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Baolin Wang baolin.wang@linaro.org
[ Upstream commit 2a010461207cc96bee5ab81748325dec1972976f ]
We found the I2C controller count register is unreliable sometimes, that will cause I2C to lose data. Thus we can read the data count from 'i2c_dev->count' instead of the I2C controller count register.
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang baolin.wang@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang wsa@the-dreams.de Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sprd.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sprd.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sprd.c @@ -368,13 +368,12 @@ static irqreturn_t sprd_i2c_isr_thread(i struct sprd_i2c *i2c_dev = dev_id; struct i2c_msg *msg = i2c_dev->msg; bool ack = !(readl(i2c_dev->base + I2C_STATUS) & I2C_RX_ACK); - u32 i2c_count = readl(i2c_dev->base + I2C_COUNT); u32 i2c_tran;
if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) i2c_tran = i2c_dev->count >= I2C_FIFO_FULL_THLD; else - i2c_tran = i2c_count; + i2c_tran = i2c_dev->count;
/* * If we got one ACK from slave when writing data, and we did not @@ -412,14 +411,13 @@ static irqreturn_t sprd_i2c_isr(int irq, { struct sprd_i2c *i2c_dev = dev_id; struct i2c_msg *msg = i2c_dev->msg; - u32 i2c_count = readl(i2c_dev->base + I2C_COUNT); bool ack = !(readl(i2c_dev->base + I2C_STATUS) & I2C_RX_ACK); u32 i2c_tran;
if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) i2c_tran = i2c_dev->count >= I2C_FIFO_FULL_THLD; else - i2c_tran = i2c_count; + i2c_tran = i2c_dev->count;
/* * If we did not get one ACK from slave when writing data, then we