4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sudeep Holla sudeep.holla@arm.com
commit f57ab9a01a36ef3454333251cc57e3a9948b17bf upstream.
Commit dfea747d2aba ("drivers: base: cacheinfo: support DT overrides for cache properties") doesn't initialise the cache type if it's present only in DT and the architecture is not aware of it. They are unified system level cache which are generally transparent.
This patch check if the cache type is set to NOCACHE but the DT node indicates that it's unified cache and sets the cache type accordingly.
Fixes: dfea747d2aba ("drivers: base: cacheinfo: support DT overrides for cache properties") Reported-and-tested-by: Tan Xiaojun tanxiaojun@huawei.com Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla sudeep.holla@arm.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c +++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c @@ -186,6 +186,11 @@ static void cache_associativity(struct c this_leaf->ways_of_associativity = (size / nr_sets) / line_size; }
+static bool cache_node_is_unified(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf) +{ + return of_property_read_bool(this_leaf->of_node, "cache-unified"); +} + static void cache_of_override_properties(unsigned int cpu) { int index; @@ -194,6 +199,14 @@ static void cache_of_override_properties
for (index = 0; index < cache_leaves(cpu); index++) { this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index; + /* + * init_cache_level must setup the cache level correctly + * overriding the architecturally specified levels, so + * if type is NONE at this stage, it should be unified + */ + if (this_leaf->type == CACHE_TYPE_NOCACHE && + cache_node_is_unified(this_leaf)) + this_leaf->type = CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED; cache_size(this_leaf); cache_get_line_size(this_leaf); cache_nr_sets(this_leaf);