On Mon, 2018-05-28 at 11:58 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
From: Markus Elfring elfring@users.sourceforge.net
I still wonder why any Markus Elfring patch should be applied to a stable branch.
The only reason I could believe is it would make forward porting of an actually useful fix easier.
Does this?
[ Upstream commit 6f0a60298bbbea43ab5e3955913ab19c153076f3 ]
Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in these functions.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring elfring@users.sourceforge.net Signed-off-by: Inki Dae inki.dae@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c @@ -286,7 +286,6 @@ static int g2d_init_cmdlist(struct g2d_d node = kcalloc(G2D_CMDLIST_NUM, sizeof(*node), GFP_KERNEL); if (!node) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate memory\n");@@ -1358,10 +1357,9 @@ int exynos_g2d_exec_ioctl(struct drm_dev return -EFAULT; runqueue_node = kmem_cache_alloc(g2d->runqueue_slab, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!runqueue_node) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate memory\n");
- if (!runqueue_node) return -ENOMEM;
- }
- run_cmdlist = &runqueue_node->run_cmdlist; event_list = &runqueue_node->event_list; INIT_LIST_HEAD(run_cmdlist);