5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sean Christopherson seanjc@google.com
[ Upstream commit e750f85391286a4c8100275516973324b621a269 ]
When completing emulation of instruction that generated a userspace exit for I/O, don't recheck L1 intercepts as KVM has already finished that phase of instruction execution, i.e. has already committed to allowing L2 to perform I/O. If L1 (or host userspace) modifies the I/O permission bitmaps during the exit to userspace, KVM will treat the access as being intercepted despite already having emulated the I/O access.
Pivot on EMULTYPE_NO_DECODE to detect that KVM is completing emulation. Of the three users of EMULTYPE_NO_DECODE, only complete_emulated_io() (the intended "recipient") can reach the code in question. gp_interception()'s use is mutually exclusive with is_guest_mode(), and complete_emulated_insn_gp() unconditionally pairs EMULTYPE_NO_DECODE with EMULTYPE_SKIP.
The bad behavior was detected by a syzkaller program that toggles port I/O interception during the userspace I/O exit, ultimately resulting in a WARN on vcpu->arch.pio.count being non-zero due to KVM no completing emulation of the I/O instruction.
WARNING: CPU: 23 PID: 1083 at arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:8039 emulator_pio_in_out+0x154/0x170 [kvm] Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass CPU: 23 UID: 1000 PID: 1083 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.16.0-rc5-c1610d2d66b1-next-vm #74 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:emulator_pio_in_out+0x154/0x170 [kvm] PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> kvm_fast_pio+0xd6/0x1d0 [kvm] vmx_handle_exit+0x149/0x610 [kvm_intel] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xda8/0x1ac0 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x244/0x8c0 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x5d/0xc60 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 </TASK>
Reported-by: syzbot+cc2032ba16cc2018ca25@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/68790db4.a00a0220.3af5df.0020.GAE@google.com Fixes: 8a76d7f25f8f ("KVM: x86: Add x86 callback for intercept check") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jim Mattson jmattson@google.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250715190638.1899116-1-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson seanjc@google.com [ is_guest_mode() was open coded ] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 11 ++++------- arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 9 ++++++++- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c @@ -5544,12 +5544,11 @@ void init_decode_cache(struct x86_emulat ctxt->mem_read.end = 0; }
-int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) +int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, bool check_intercepts) { const struct x86_emulate_ops *ops = ctxt->ops; int rc = X86EMUL_CONTINUE; int saved_dst_type = ctxt->dst.type; - unsigned emul_flags;
ctxt->mem_read.pos = 0;
@@ -5563,8 +5562,6 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ rc = emulate_ud(ctxt); goto done; } - - emul_flags = ctxt->ops->get_hflags(ctxt); if (unlikely(ctxt->d & (No64|Undefined|Sse|Mmx|Intercept|CheckPerm|Priv|Prot|String))) { if ((ctxt->mode == X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64 && (ctxt->d & No64)) || @@ -5598,7 +5595,7 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ fetch_possible_mmx_operand(&ctxt->dst); }
- if (unlikely(emul_flags & X86EMUL_GUEST_MASK) && ctxt->intercept) { + if (unlikely(check_intercepts) && ctxt->intercept) { rc = emulator_check_intercept(ctxt, ctxt->intercept, X86_ICPT_PRE_EXCEPT); if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE) @@ -5627,7 +5624,7 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ goto done; }
- if (unlikely(emul_flags & X86EMUL_GUEST_MASK) && (ctxt->d & Intercept)) { + if (unlikely(check_intercepts) && (ctxt->d & Intercept)) { rc = emulator_check_intercept(ctxt, ctxt->intercept, X86_ICPT_POST_EXCEPT); if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE) @@ -5681,7 +5678,7 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_
special_insn:
- if (unlikely(emul_flags & X86EMUL_GUEST_MASK) && (ctxt->d & Intercept)) { + if (unlikely(check_intercepts) && (ctxt->d & Intercept)) { rc = emulator_check_intercept(ctxt, ctxt->intercept, X86_ICPT_POST_MEMACCESS); if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE) --- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h @@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ bool x86_page_table_writing_insn(struct #define EMULATION_RESTART 1 #define EMULATION_INTERCEPTED 2 void init_decode_cache(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt); -int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt); +int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, bool check_intercepts); int emulator_task_switch(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, u16 tss_selector, int idt_index, int reason, bool has_error_code, u32 error_code); --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -7668,7 +7668,14 @@ restart: ctxt->exception.address = 0; }
- r = x86_emulate_insn(ctxt); + /* + * Check L1's instruction intercepts when emulating instructions for + * L2, unless KVM is re-emulating a previously decoded instruction, + * e.g. to complete userspace I/O, in which case KVM has already + * checked the intercepts. + */ + r = x86_emulate_insn(ctxt, is_guest_mode(vcpu) && + !(emulation_type & EMULTYPE_NO_DECODE));
if (r == EMULATION_INTERCEPTED) return 1;