26 Mar
2025
26 Mar
'25
5:57 p.m.
On Mar 26, 2025, at 6:18 AM, Phil Auld pauld@redhat.com wrote:
We've got some cases that look to be hitting this as well.
I'm a little concerned about turning some runtime checks into BUG_ON()s but in this case I think we are really just going to trap out on !has_pushable_tasks() check first and if not, pick a different task and don't drop the lock so it should pass the BUG_ON()s and fail to match the original task. So...
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld pauld@redhat.com
Thanks Phil for your review. Just FYI this is the link to v3 (latest version) of this change https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250225180553.167995-1-harshit@nutanix.com/ No change here in the code w.r.t v2. I had just updated the commit message to add stable maintainers.
Regards, Harshit