On Mon, 28 Oct 2024, Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi@intel.com wrote:
+Jani
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 05:04:02PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
Disabling HPD polling from i915_hpd_poll_init_work() involves probing all display connectors explicitly to account for lost hotplug interrupts. On some platforms (mostly pre-ICL) with HDMI connectors the I2C EDID bit-banging using udelay() triggers in turn the
workqueue: i915_hpd_poll_init_work [i915] hogged CPU for >10000us 4 times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
warning.
Fix the above by scheduling i915_hpd_poll_init_work() on a WQ_UNBOUND workqueue. It's ok to use a system WQ, since i915_hpd_poll_init_work() is properly flushed in intel_hpd_cancel_work().
The connector probing from drm_mode_config::output_poll_work resulting in the same warning is fixed by the next patch.
Cc: Tejun Heo tj@kernel.org Cc: Heiner Kallweit hkallweit1@gmail.com CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.5 Suggested-by: Tejun Heo tj@kernel.org Suggested-by: Heiner Kallweit hkallweit1@gmail.com Reported-by: Heiner Kallweit hkallweit1@gmail.com Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/9245 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/f7e21caa-e98d-e5b5-932a-fe12d27fde9b@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Imre Deak imre.deak@intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c index e8562f6f8bb44..accc2fec562a0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c @@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ void intel_hpd_poll_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) * As well, there's no issue if we race here since we always reschedule * this worker anyway */
- queue_work(dev_priv->unordered_wq,
- queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &dev_priv->display.hotplug.poll_init_work);
}
@@ -803,7 +803,7 @@ void intel_hpd_poll_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) return;
WRITE_ONCE(dev_priv->display.hotplug.poll_enabled, false);
- queue_work(dev_priv->unordered_wq,
- queue_work(system_unbound_wq,
This 1y+ patch doesn't apply anymore and now we also have xe to account for. I'm reviving this since we are unifying the kernel config in CI and now several machines testing i915 start to hit this warning.
Looking at the current code for xe we have:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h:
/** @unordered_wq: used to serialize unordered work, mostly display */ struct workqueue_struct *unordered_wq;... which is, actually, just display.
Jani, should we move this wq to display where it belongs, with the right flags, rather than queueing it on system_unbound_wq?
I think the general answer is:
1. Never use i915 or xe core workqueues in display code.
2. Use system workqueues where appropriate for display, and cancel the individual work where needed. While there are legitimate uses for the dedicated workqueues, I'm guessing a large portion of their use may be cargo-culting and/or the result of system wq flush going away, and not based on any real analysis.
3. For display stuff, add the minimal necessary workqueues in display code, and use them where appropriate. Also cancel the individual work where needed, and flush the entire workqueue only when really necessary. The entire workqueue flushing is also cargo-culting and/or the result of system wq flush going away.
4. Finally move the display wq init/cleanup to display code.
Now, I don't know what the answer in this particular case, or many of the other cases, is. And that's probably one of the reasons we have the status quo. :(
BR, Jani.