Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 08:03:24AM +0200:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 10:15:30AM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote:
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 06:18:10PM +0200:
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
This reverts commit 0096d223f78cb48db1ae8ae9fd56d702896ba8ae which is commit 150e792dee9ca8416f3d375e48f2f4d7f701fc6b upstream.
It breaks the build and shouldn't be here, it was applied to make a follow-up one apply easier.
Reported-by: Dominique Martinet asmadeus@codewreck.org
It's a detail but if you fix anything else in this branch I'd appreciate this mail being updated to my work address: Reported-by: Dominique Martinet dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com
(Sorry for the annoyance, just trying to keep the boundary with stable kernel work I do for $job and 9p work on I do on my free time; if you're not updating the patches feel free to leave it that way - thanks for having taken the time to revert the commit in the first place!)
We can't really change things that are already in the tree, so we just copy the commit directly from that, sorry.
This commit isn't in tree yet -- it's a patch specific to the 5.10 branch that doesn't exist anywhere else (not a backport), and 5.10.225 hasn't been tagged yet.
With that said I'll reiterate it's probably not worth the trouble, just replying because I don't understand where that "already in the tree" came from.
Thanks,