5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Quan Nguyen quan@os.amperecomputing.com
[ Upstream commit b4cc1cbba5195a4dd497cf2f8f09e7807977d543 ]
Some masters may drive the transfers with low enough latency between the nak/stop phase of the current command and the start/address phase of the following command that the interrupts are coalesced by the time we process them. Handle the stop conditions before processing SLAVE_MATCH to fix the complaints that sometimes occur below.
"aspeed-i2c-bus 1e78a040.i2c-bus: irq handled != irq. Expected 0x00000086, but was 0x00000084"
Fixes: f9eb91350bb2 ("i2c: aspeed: added slave support for Aspeed I2C driver") Signed-off-by: Quan Nguyen quan@os.amperecomputing.com Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery andrew@codeconstruct.com.au Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti andi.shyti@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang wsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c index a1bc8a2c3eadc..b915dfcff00d8 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c @@ -250,18 +250,46 @@ static u32 aspeed_i2c_slave_irq(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, u32 irq_status) if (!slave) return 0;
- command = readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_CMD_REG); + /* + * Handle stop conditions early, prior to SLAVE_MATCH. Some masters may drive + * transfers with low enough latency between the nak/stop phase of the current + * command and the start/address phase of the following command that the + * interrupts are coalesced by the time we process them. + */ + if (irq_status & ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_NORMAL_STOP) { + irq_handled |= ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_NORMAL_STOP; + bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_STOP; + } + + if (irq_status & ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_TX_NAK && + bus->slave_state == ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED) { + irq_handled |= ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_TX_NAK; + bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_STOP; + } + + /* Propagate any stop conditions to the slave implementation. */ + if (bus->slave_state == ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_STOP) { + i2c_slave_event(slave, I2C_SLAVE_STOP, &value); + bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_INACTIVE; + }
- /* Slave was requested, restart state machine. */ + /* + * Now that we've dealt with any potentially coalesced stop conditions, + * address any start conditions. + */ if (irq_status & ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_SLAVE_MATCH) { irq_handled |= ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_SLAVE_MATCH; bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_START; }
- /* Slave is not currently active, irq was for someone else. */ + /* + * If the slave has been stopped and not started then slave interrupt + * handling is complete. + */ if (bus->slave_state == ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_INACTIVE) return irq_handled;
+ command = readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_CMD_REG); dev_dbg(bus->dev, "slave irq status 0x%08x, cmd 0x%08x\n", irq_status, command);
@@ -280,17 +308,6 @@ static u32 aspeed_i2c_slave_irq(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, u32 irq_status) irq_handled |= ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_RX_DONE; }
- /* Slave was asked to stop. */ - if (irq_status & ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_NORMAL_STOP) { - irq_handled |= ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_NORMAL_STOP; - bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_STOP; - } - if (irq_status & ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_TX_NAK && - bus->slave_state == ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED) { - irq_handled |= ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_TX_NAK; - bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_STOP; - } - switch (bus->slave_state) { case ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED: if (unlikely(irq_status & ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_TX_ACK)) @@ -319,8 +336,7 @@ static u32 aspeed_i2c_slave_irq(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, u32 irq_status) i2c_slave_event(slave, I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED, &value); break; case ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_STOP: - i2c_slave_event(slave, I2C_SLAVE_STOP, &value); - bus->slave_state = ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_INACTIVE; + /* Stop event handling is done early. Unreachable. */ break; case ASPEED_I2C_SLAVE_START: /* Slave was just started. Waiting for the next event. */;