From: "Paul E. McKenney" paulmck@kernel.org
The more intense grace-period processing resulting from the 50x RCU Tasks Trace grace-period speedups exposed the following race condition:
o Task A running on CPU 0 executes rcu_read_lock_trace(), entering a read-side critical section.
o When Task A eventually invokes rcu_read_unlock_trace() to exit its read-side critical section, this function notes that the ->trc_reader_special.s flag is zero and and therefore invoke wil set ->trc_reader_nesting to zero using WRITE_ONCE(). But before that happens...
o The RCU Tasks Trace grace-period kthread running on some other CPU interrogates Task A, but this fails because this task is currently running. This kthread therefore sends an IPI to CPU 0.
o CPU 0 receives the IPI, and thus invokes trc_read_check_handler(). Because Task A has not yet cleared its ->trc_reader_nesting counter, this function sees that Task A is still within its read-side critical section. This function therefore sets the ->trc_reader_nesting.b.need_qs flag, AKA the .need_qs flag.
Except that Task A has already checked the .need_qs flag, which is part of the ->trc_reader_special.s flag. The .need_qs flag therefore remains set until Task A's next rcu_read_unlock_trace().
o Task A now invokes synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace(), which cannot start a new grace period until the current grace period completes. And thus cannot return until after that time.
But Task A's .need_qs flag is still set, which prevents the current grace period from completing. And because Task A is blocked, it will never execute rcu_read_unlock_trace() until its call to synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace() returns.
We are therefore deadlocked.
This race is improbable, but 80 hours of rcutorture made it happen twice. The race was possible before the grace-period speedup, but roughly 50x less probable. Several thousand hours of rcutorture would have been necessary to have a reasonable chance of making this happen before this 50x speedup.
This commit therefore eliminates this deadlock by setting ->trc_reader_nesting to a large negative number before checking the .need_qs and zeroing (or decrementing with respect to its initial value) ->trc_reader_nesting. For its part, the IPI handler's trc_read_check_handler() function adds a check for negative values, deferring evaluation of the task in this case. Taken together, these changes avoid this deadlock scenario.
Fixes: 276c410448db ("rcu-tasks: Split ->trc_reader_need_end") Cc: Alexei Starovoitov alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com Cc: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Cc: Jiri Olsa jolsa@redhat.com Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.7.x Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney paulmck@kernel.org --- include/linux/rcupdate_trace.h | 4 ++++ kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate_trace.h b/include/linux/rcupdate_trace.h index d9015aa..a6a6a3a 100644 --- a/include/linux/rcupdate_trace.h +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate_trace.h @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock_trace(void) struct task_struct *t = current;
WRITE_ONCE(t->trc_reader_nesting, READ_ONCE(t->trc_reader_nesting) + 1); + barrier(); if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU_READ_MB) && t->trc_reader_special.b.need_mb) smp_mb(); // Pairs with update-side barriers @@ -72,6 +73,9 @@ static inline void rcu_read_unlock_trace(void)
rcu_lock_release(&rcu_trace_lock_map); nesting = READ_ONCE(t->trc_reader_nesting) - 1; + barrier(); // Critical section before disabling. + // Disable IPI-based setting of .need_qs. + WRITE_ONCE(t->trc_reader_nesting, INT_MIN); if (likely(!READ_ONCE(t->trc_reader_special.s)) || nesting) { WRITE_ONCE(t->trc_reader_nesting, nesting); return; // We assume shallow reader nesting. diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h index a0eaed5..e583a2d 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h @@ -830,6 +830,12 @@ static void trc_read_check_handler(void *t_in) WRITE_ONCE(t->trc_reader_checked, true); goto reset_ipi; } + // If we are racing with an rcu_read_unlock_trace(), try again later. + if (unlikely(t->trc_reader_nesting < 0)) { + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_dec_and_test(&trc_n_readers_need_end))) + wake_up(&trc_wait); + goto reset_ipi; + } WRITE_ONCE(t->trc_reader_checked, true);
// Get here if the task is in a read-side critical section. Set