From: Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com
[ Upstream commit 4eb6bd55cfb22ffc20652732340c4962f3ac9a91 ]
Once upgrading the minimum supported version of GCC to 5.1, we can drop the fallback code for !COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW.
This is effectively a revert of commit f0907827a8a9 ("compiler.h: enable builtin overflow checkers and add fallback code")
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1438#issuecomment-916745801 Suggested-by: Rasmus Villemoes linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com Acked-by: Kees Cook keescook@chromium.org Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor nathan@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Eliav Farber farbere@amazon.com --- include/linux/compiler-clang.h | 13 --- include/linux/compiler-gcc.h | 4 - include/linux/overflow.h | 138 +--------------------------- tools/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h | 4 - tools/include/linux/overflow.h | 140 +---------------------------- 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 293 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h index 9ba951e3a6c2..928ec5c7776d 100644 --- a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h +++ b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h @@ -72,19 +72,6 @@ #define __no_sanitize_coverage #endif
-/* - * Not all versions of clang implement the type-generic versions - * of the builtin overflow checkers. Fortunately, clang implements - * __has_builtin allowing us to avoid awkward version - * checks. Unfortunately, we don't know which version of gcc clang - * pretends to be, so the macro may or may not be defined. - */ -#if __has_builtin(__builtin_mul_overflow) && \ - __has_builtin(__builtin_add_overflow) && \ - __has_builtin(__builtin_sub_overflow) -#define COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW 1 -#endif - #if __has_feature(shadow_call_stack) # define __noscs __attribute__((__no_sanitize__("shadow-call-stack"))) #endif diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h index 5b481a22b5fe..ae9a8e17287c 100644 --- a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h +++ b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h @@ -140,10 +140,6 @@ #define __no_sanitize_coverage #endif
-#if GCC_VERSION >= 50100 -#define COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW 1 -#endif - /* * Turn individual warnings and errors on and off locally, depending * on version. diff --git a/include/linux/overflow.h b/include/linux/overflow.h index d1dd039fe1c3..59d7228104d0 100644 --- a/include/linux/overflow.h +++ b/include/linux/overflow.h @@ -6,12 +6,9 @@ #include <linux/limits.h>
/* - * In the fallback code below, we need to compute the minimum and - * maximum values representable in a given type. These macros may also - * be useful elsewhere, so we provide them outside the - * COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW block. - * - * It would seem more obvious to do something like + * We need to compute the minimum and maximum values representable in a given + * type. These macros may also be useful elsewhere. It would seem more obvious + * to do something like: * * #define type_min(T) (T)(is_signed_type(T) ? (T)1 << (8*sizeof(T)-1) : 0) * #define type_max(T) (T)(is_signed_type(T) ? ((T)1 << (8*sizeof(T)-1)) - 1 : ~(T)0) @@ -54,7 +51,6 @@ static inline bool __must_check __must_check_overflow(bool overflow) return unlikely(overflow); }
-#ifdef COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW /* * For simplicity and code hygiene, the fallback code below insists on * a, b and *d having the same type (similar to the min() and max() @@ -90,134 +86,6 @@ static inline bool __must_check __must_check_overflow(bool overflow) __builtin_mul_overflow(__a, __b, __d); \ }))
-#else - - -/* Checking for unsigned overflow is relatively easy without causing UB. */ -#define __unsigned_add_overflow(a, b, d) ({ \ - typeof(a) __a = (a); \ - typeof(b) __b = (b); \ - typeof(d) __d = (d); \ - (void) (&__a == &__b); \ - (void) (&__a == __d); \ - *__d = __a + __b; \ - *__d < __a; \ -}) -#define __unsigned_sub_overflow(a, b, d) ({ \ - typeof(a) __a = (a); \ - typeof(b) __b = (b); \ - typeof(d) __d = (d); \ - (void) (&__a == &__b); \ - (void) (&__a == __d); \ - *__d = __a - __b; \ - __a < __b; \ -}) -/* - * If one of a or b is a compile-time constant, this avoids a division. - */ -#define __unsigned_mul_overflow(a, b, d) ({ \ - typeof(a) __a = (a); \ - typeof(b) __b = (b); \ - typeof(d) __d = (d); \ - (void) (&__a == &__b); \ - (void) (&__a == __d); \ - *__d = __a * __b; \ - __builtin_constant_p(__b) ? \ - __b > 0 && __a > type_max(typeof(__a)) / __b : \ - __a > 0 && __b > type_max(typeof(__b)) / __a; \ -}) - -/* - * For signed types, detecting overflow is much harder, especially if - * we want to avoid UB. But the interface of these macros is such that - * we must provide a result in *d, and in fact we must produce the - * result promised by gcc's builtins, which is simply the possibly - * wrapped-around value. Fortunately, we can just formally do the - * operations in the widest relevant unsigned type (u64) and then - * truncate the result - gcc is smart enough to generate the same code - * with and without the (u64) casts. - */ - -/* - * Adding two signed integers can overflow only if they have the same - * sign, and overflow has happened iff the result has the opposite - * sign. - */ -#define __signed_add_overflow(a, b, d) ({ \ - typeof(a) __a = (a); \ - typeof(b) __b = (b); \ - typeof(d) __d = (d); \ - (void) (&__a == &__b); \ - (void) (&__a == __d); \ - *__d = (u64)__a + (u64)__b; \ - (((~(__a ^ __b)) & (*__d ^ __a)) \ - & type_min(typeof(__a))) != 0; \ -}) - -/* - * Subtraction is similar, except that overflow can now happen only - * when the signs are opposite. In this case, overflow has happened if - * the result has the opposite sign of a. - */ -#define __signed_sub_overflow(a, b, d) ({ \ - typeof(a) __a = (a); \ - typeof(b) __b = (b); \ - typeof(d) __d = (d); \ - (void) (&__a == &__b); \ - (void) (&__a == __d); \ - *__d = (u64)__a - (u64)__b; \ - ((((__a ^ __b)) & (*__d ^ __a)) \ - & type_min(typeof(__a))) != 0; \ -}) - -/* - * Signed multiplication is rather hard. gcc always follows C99, so - * division is truncated towards 0. This means that we can write the - * overflow check like this: - * - * (a > 0 && (b > MAX/a || b < MIN/a)) || - * (a < -1 && (b > MIN/a || b < MAX/a) || - * (a == -1 && b == MIN) - * - * The redundant casts of -1 are to silence an annoying -Wtype-limits - * (included in -Wextra) warning: When the type is u8 or u16, the - * __b_c_e in check_mul_overflow obviously selects - * __unsigned_mul_overflow, but unfortunately gcc still parses this - * code and warns about the limited range of __b. - */ - -#define __signed_mul_overflow(a, b, d) ({ \ - typeof(a) __a = (a); \ - typeof(b) __b = (b); \ - typeof(d) __d = (d); \ - typeof(a) __tmax = type_max(typeof(a)); \ - typeof(a) __tmin = type_min(typeof(a)); \ - (void) (&__a == &__b); \ - (void) (&__a == __d); \ - *__d = (u64)__a * (u64)__b; \ - (__b > 0 && (__a > __tmax/__b || __a < __tmin/__b)) || \ - (__b < (typeof(__b))-1 && (__a > __tmin/__b || __a < __tmax/__b)) || \ - (__b == (typeof(__b))-1 && __a == __tmin); \ -}) - - -#define check_add_overflow(a, b, d) __must_check_overflow( \ - __builtin_choose_expr(is_signed_type(typeof(a)), \ - __signed_add_overflow(a, b, d), \ - __unsigned_add_overflow(a, b, d))) - -#define check_sub_overflow(a, b, d) __must_check_overflow( \ - __builtin_choose_expr(is_signed_type(typeof(a)), \ - __signed_sub_overflow(a, b, d), \ - __unsigned_sub_overflow(a, b, d))) - -#define check_mul_overflow(a, b, d) __must_check_overflow( \ - __builtin_choose_expr(is_signed_type(typeof(a)), \ - __signed_mul_overflow(a, b, d), \ - __unsigned_mul_overflow(a, b, d))) - -#endif /* COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW */ - /** check_shl_overflow() - Calculate a left-shifted value and check overflow * * @a: Value to be shifted diff --git a/tools/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h b/tools/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h index 95c072b70d0e..a590a1dfafd9 100644 --- a/tools/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h +++ b/tools/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h @@ -38,7 +38,3 @@ #endif #define __printf(a, b) __attribute__((format(printf, a, b))) #define __scanf(a, b) __attribute__((format(scanf, a, b))) - -#if GCC_VERSION >= 50100 -#define COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW 1 -#endif diff --git a/tools/include/linux/overflow.h b/tools/include/linux/overflow.h index 8712ff70995f..dcb0c1bf6866 100644 --- a/tools/include/linux/overflow.h +++ b/tools/include/linux/overflow.h @@ -5,12 +5,9 @@ #include <linux/compiler.h>
/* - * In the fallback code below, we need to compute the minimum and - * maximum values representable in a given type. These macros may also - * be useful elsewhere, so we provide them outside the - * COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW block. - * - * It would seem more obvious to do something like + * We need to compute the minimum and maximum values representable in a given + * type. These macros may also be useful elsewhere. It would seem more obvious + * to do something like: * * #define type_min(T) (T)(is_signed_type(T) ? (T)1 << (8*sizeof(T)-1) : 0) * #define type_max(T) (T)(is_signed_type(T) ? ((T)1 << (8*sizeof(T)-1)) - 1 : ~(T)0) @@ -36,8 +33,6 @@ #define type_max(T) ((T)((__type_half_max(T) - 1) + __type_half_max(T))) #define type_min(T) ((T)((T)-type_max(T)-(T)1))
- -#ifdef COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW /* * For simplicity and code hygiene, the fallback code below insists on * a, b and *d having the same type (similar to the min() and max() @@ -73,135 +68,6 @@ __builtin_mul_overflow(__a, __b, __d); \ })
-#else - - -/* Checking for unsigned overflow is relatively easy without causing UB. */ -#define __unsigned_add_overflow(a, b, d) ({ \ - typeof(a) __a = (a); \ - typeof(b) __b = (b); \ - typeof(d) __d = (d); \ - (void) (&__a == &__b); \ - (void) (&__a == __d); \ - *__d = __a + __b; \ - *__d < __a; \ -}) -#define __unsigned_sub_overflow(a, b, d) ({ \ - typeof(a) __a = (a); \ - typeof(b) __b = (b); \ - typeof(d) __d = (d); \ - (void) (&__a == &__b); \ - (void) (&__a == __d); \ - *__d = __a - __b; \ - __a < __b; \ -}) -/* - * If one of a or b is a compile-time constant, this avoids a division. - */ -#define __unsigned_mul_overflow(a, b, d) ({ \ - typeof(a) __a = (a); \ - typeof(b) __b = (b); \ - typeof(d) __d = (d); \ - (void) (&__a == &__b); \ - (void) (&__a == __d); \ - *__d = __a * __b; \ - __builtin_constant_p(__b) ? \ - __b > 0 && __a > type_max(typeof(__a)) / __b : \ - __a > 0 && __b > type_max(typeof(__b)) / __a; \ -}) - -/* - * For signed types, detecting overflow is much harder, especially if - * we want to avoid UB. But the interface of these macros is such that - * we must provide a result in *d, and in fact we must produce the - * result promised by gcc's builtins, which is simply the possibly - * wrapped-around value. Fortunately, we can just formally do the - * operations in the widest relevant unsigned type (u64) and then - * truncate the result - gcc is smart enough to generate the same code - * with and without the (u64) casts. - */ - -/* - * Adding two signed integers can overflow only if they have the same - * sign, and overflow has happened iff the result has the opposite - * sign. - */ -#define __signed_add_overflow(a, b, d) ({ \ - typeof(a) __a = (a); \ - typeof(b) __b = (b); \ - typeof(d) __d = (d); \ - (void) (&__a == &__b); \ - (void) (&__a == __d); \ - *__d = (u64)__a + (u64)__b; \ - (((~(__a ^ __b)) & (*__d ^ __a)) \ - & type_min(typeof(__a))) != 0; \ -}) - -/* - * Subtraction is similar, except that overflow can now happen only - * when the signs are opposite. In this case, overflow has happened if - * the result has the opposite sign of a. - */ -#define __signed_sub_overflow(a, b, d) ({ \ - typeof(a) __a = (a); \ - typeof(b) __b = (b); \ - typeof(d) __d = (d); \ - (void) (&__a == &__b); \ - (void) (&__a == __d); \ - *__d = (u64)__a - (u64)__b; \ - ((((__a ^ __b)) & (*__d ^ __a)) \ - & type_min(typeof(__a))) != 0; \ -}) - -/* - * Signed multiplication is rather hard. gcc always follows C99, so - * division is truncated towards 0. This means that we can write the - * overflow check like this: - * - * (a > 0 && (b > MAX/a || b < MIN/a)) || - * (a < -1 && (b > MIN/a || b < MAX/a) || - * (a == -1 && b == MIN) - * - * The redundant casts of -1 are to silence an annoying -Wtype-limits - * (included in -Wextra) warning: When the type is u8 or u16, the - * __b_c_e in check_mul_overflow obviously selects - * __unsigned_mul_overflow, but unfortunately gcc still parses this - * code and warns about the limited range of __b. - */ - -#define __signed_mul_overflow(a, b, d) ({ \ - typeof(a) __a = (a); \ - typeof(b) __b = (b); \ - typeof(d) __d = (d); \ - typeof(a) __tmax = type_max(typeof(a)); \ - typeof(a) __tmin = type_min(typeof(a)); \ - (void) (&__a == &__b); \ - (void) (&__a == __d); \ - *__d = (u64)__a * (u64)__b; \ - (__b > 0 && (__a > __tmax/__b || __a < __tmin/__b)) || \ - (__b < (typeof(__b))-1 && (__a > __tmin/__b || __a < __tmax/__b)) || \ - (__b == (typeof(__b))-1 && __a == __tmin); \ -}) - - -#define check_add_overflow(a, b, d) \ - __builtin_choose_expr(is_signed_type(typeof(a)), \ - __signed_add_overflow(a, b, d), \ - __unsigned_add_overflow(a, b, d)) - -#define check_sub_overflow(a, b, d) \ - __builtin_choose_expr(is_signed_type(typeof(a)), \ - __signed_sub_overflow(a, b, d), \ - __unsigned_sub_overflow(a, b, d)) - -#define check_mul_overflow(a, b, d) \ - __builtin_choose_expr(is_signed_type(typeof(a)), \ - __signed_mul_overflow(a, b, d), \ - __unsigned_mul_overflow(a, b, d)) - - -#endif /* COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW */ - /** * array_size() - Calculate size of 2-dimensional array. *