The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x f1fb088d9cecde5c3066d8ff8846789667519b7d # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to 'stable@vger.kernel.org' --in-reply-to '2025042805-scorer-petty-9d6b@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From f1fb088d9cecde5c3066d8ff8846789667519b7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sean Christopherson seanjc@google.com Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 12:38:19 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Take irqfds.lock when adding/deleting IRQ bypass producer
Take irqfds.lock when adding/deleting an IRQ bypass producer to ensure irqfd->producer isn't modified while kvm_irq_routing_update() is running. The only lock held when a producer is added/removed is irqbypass's mutex.
Fixes: 872768800652 ("KVM: x86: select IRQ_BYPASS_MANAGER") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson seanjc@google.com Message-ID: 20250404193923.1413163-5-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini pbonzini@redhat.com
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index 9c98b77b7dc1..a6829a370e6a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -13561,15 +13561,22 @@ int kvm_arch_irq_bypass_add_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons, { struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd = container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer); + struct kvm *kvm = irqfd->kvm; int ret;
- irqfd->producer = prod; kvm_arch_start_assignment(irqfd->kvm); + + spin_lock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock); + irqfd->producer = prod; + ret = kvm_x86_call(pi_update_irte)(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq, irqfd->gsi, 1); if (ret) kvm_arch_end_assignment(irqfd->kvm);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock); + + return ret; }
@@ -13579,9 +13586,9 @@ void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons, int ret; struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd = container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer); + struct kvm *kvm = irqfd->kvm;
WARN_ON(irqfd->producer != prod); - irqfd->producer = NULL;
/* * When producer of consumer is unregistered, we change back to @@ -13589,12 +13596,18 @@ void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons, * when the irq is masked/disabled or the consumer side (KVM * int this case doesn't want to receive the interrupts. */ + spin_lock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock); + irqfd->producer = NULL; + ret = kvm_x86_call(pi_update_irte)(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq, irqfd->gsi, 0); if (ret) printk(KERN_INFO "irq bypass consumer (token %p) unregistration" " fails: %d\n", irqfd->consumer.token, ret);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock); + + kvm_arch_end_assignment(irqfd->kvm); }