6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Haoxiang Li haoxiang_li2024@163.com
[ Upstream commit ad9bb8f049717d64c5e62b2a44954be9f681c65b ]
The check for get_zeroed_page() leads to a direct return and overlooked the memory leak caused by loop allocation. Add a free helper to free spaces allocated by get_zeroed_page().
Signed-off-by: Haoxiang Li haoxiang_li2024@163.com Acked-by: Heiko Carstens hca@linux.ibm.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250218034104.2436469-1-haoxiang_li2024@163.com Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik gor@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/s390/char/sclp_tty.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_tty.c b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_tty.c index 892c18d2f87e9..d3edacb6ee148 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_tty.c +++ b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_tty.c @@ -490,6 +490,17 @@ static const struct tty_operations sclp_ops = { .flush_buffer = sclp_tty_flush_buffer, };
+/* Release allocated pages. */ +static void __init __sclp_tty_free_pages(void) +{ + struct list_head *page, *p; + + list_for_each_safe(page, p, &sclp_tty_pages) { + list_del(page); + free_page((unsigned long)page); + } +} + static int __init sclp_tty_init(void) { @@ -516,6 +527,7 @@ sclp_tty_init(void) for (i = 0; i < MAX_KMEM_PAGES; i++) { page = (void *) get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA); if (page == NULL) { + __sclp_tty_free_pages(); tty_driver_kref_put(driver); return -ENOMEM; }