Hi Yunseong,
| BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48 | in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 20466, name: syz.0.1689 | preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 | RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 | Preemption disabled at: | [<ffff800080241600>] debug_exception_enter arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:978 [inline] | [<ffff800080241600>] do_debug_exception+0x68/0x2fc arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:997 | CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 20466 Comm: syz.0.1689 Not tainted 6.16.0-rc1-rt1-dirty #12 PREEMPT_RT | Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 2025.02-8 05/13/2025 | Call trace: | show_stack+0x2c/0x3c arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:466 (C) | __dump_stack+0x30/0x40 lib/dump_stack.c:94 | dump_stack_lvl+0x148/0x1d8 lib/dump_stack.c:120 | dump_stack+0x1c/0x3c lib/dump_stack.c:129 | __might_resched+0x2e4/0x52c kernel/sched/core.c:8800 | __rt_spin_lock kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48 [inline] | rt_spin_lock+0xa8/0x1bc kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:57 | spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_rt.h:44 [inline] | force_sig_info_to_task+0x6c/0x4a8 kernel/signal.c:1302 | force_sig_fault_to_task kernel/signal.c:1699 [inline] | force_sig_fault+0xc4/0x110 kernel/signal.c:1704 | arm64_force_sig_fault+0x6c/0x80 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:265 | send_user_sigtrap arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c:237 [inline] | single_step_handler+0x1f4/0x36c arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c:257 | do_debug_exception+0x154/0x2fc arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:1002 | el0_dbg+0x44/0x120 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:756 | el0t_64_sync_handler+0x3c/0x108 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:832 | el0t_64_sync+0x1ac/0x1b0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:600
It seems that commit eaff68b32861 ("arm64: entry: Add entry and exit functions for debug exception") in 6.17-rc1, also present as 6fb44438a5e1 in mainline, removed code that previously avoided sleeping context issues when handling debug exceptions: Link: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/commit/arch/...
No. Her patch commit 31575e11ecf7 (arm64: debug: split brk64 exception entry) solves your splat since el0_brk64() doesn't call debug_exception_enter() by spliting el0/el1 brk64 entry exception entry.
Formerly, el(0/1)_dbg() are handled in do_debug_exception() together and it calls debug_exception_enter() disabling preemption and this makes your splat while handling brk excepttion from el0.
[...]
Thanks.
-- Sincerely, Yeoreum Yun