6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ahmed Zaki ahmed.zaki@intel.com
[ Upstream commit b2beb5bb2cd90d7939e470ed4da468683f41baa3 ]
With VIRTCHNL2_CAP_MACFILTER enabled, the following warning is generated on module load:
[ 324.701677] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:578 [ 324.701684] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1582, name: NetworkManager [ 324.701689] preempt_count: 201, expected: 0 [ 324.701693] RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 [ 324.701697] 2 locks held by NetworkManager/1582: [ 324.701702] #0: ffffffff9f7be770 (rtnl_mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: rtnl_newlink+0x791/0x21e0 [ 324.701730] #1: ff1100216c380368 (_xmit_ETHER){....}-{2:2}, at: __dev_open+0x3f0/0x870 [ 324.701749] Preemption disabled at: [ 324.701752] [<ffffffff9cd23b9d>] __dev_open+0x3dd/0x870 [ 324.701765] CPU: 30 UID: 0 PID: 1582 Comm: NetworkManager Not tainted 6.15.0-rc5+ #2 PREEMPT(voluntary) [ 324.701771] Hardware name: Intel Corporation M50FCP2SBSTD/M50FCP2SBSTD, BIOS SE5C741.86B.01.01.0001.2211140926 11/14/2022 [ 324.701774] Call Trace: [ 324.701777] <TASK> [ 324.701779] dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80 [ 324.701788] ? __dev_open+0x3dd/0x870 [ 324.701793] __might_resched.cold+0x1ef/0x23d <..> [ 324.701818] __mutex_lock+0x113/0x1b80 <..> [ 324.701917] idpf_ctlq_clean_sq+0xad/0x4b0 [idpf] [ 324.701935] ? kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 [ 324.701941] idpf_mb_clean+0x143/0x380 [idpf] <..> [ 324.701991] idpf_send_mb_msg+0x111/0x720 [idpf] [ 324.702009] idpf_vc_xn_exec+0x4cc/0x990 [idpf] [ 324.702021] ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0xc0 [ 324.702035] idpf_add_del_mac_filters+0x3ed/0xb50 [idpf] <..> [ 324.702122] __hw_addr_sync_dev+0x1cf/0x300 [ 324.702126] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90 [ 324.702134] idpf_set_rx_mode+0x317/0x390 [idpf] [ 324.702152] __dev_open+0x3f8/0x870 [ 324.702159] ? __pfx___dev_open+0x10/0x10 [ 324.702174] __dev_change_flags+0x443/0x650 <..> [ 324.702208] netif_change_flags+0x80/0x160 [ 324.702218] do_setlink.isra.0+0x16a0/0x3960 <..> [ 324.702349] rtnl_newlink+0x12fd/0x21e0
The sequence is as follows: rtnl_newlink()-> __dev_change_flags()-> __dev_open()-> dev_set_rx_mode() - > # disables BH and grabs "dev->addr_list_lock" idpf_set_rx_mode() -> # proceed only if VIRTCHNL2_CAP_MACFILTER is ON __dev_uc_sync() -> idpf_add_mac_filter -> idpf_add_del_mac_filters -> idpf_send_mb_msg() -> idpf_mb_clean() -> idpf_ctlq_clean_sq() # mutex_lock(cq_lock)
Fix by converting cq_lock to a spinlock. All operations under the new lock are safe except freeing the DMA memory, which may use vunmap(). Fix by requesting a contiguous physical memory for the DMA mapping.
Fixes: a251eee62133 ("idpf: add SRIOV support and other ndo_ops") Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ahmed Zaki ahmed.zaki@intel.com Reviewed-by: Simon Horman horms@kernel.org Tested-by: Samuel Salin Samuel.salin@intel.com Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- .../net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_controlq.c | 23 +++++++++---------- .../ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_controlq_api.h | 2 +- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_lib.c | 12 ++++++---- 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_controlq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_controlq.c index b28991dd18703..48b8e184f3db6 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_controlq.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_controlq.c @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static void idpf_ctlq_init_rxq_bufs(struct idpf_ctlq_info *cq) */ static void idpf_ctlq_shutdown(struct idpf_hw *hw, struct idpf_ctlq_info *cq) { - mutex_lock(&cq->cq_lock); + spin_lock(&cq->cq_lock);
/* free ring buffers and the ring itself */ idpf_ctlq_dealloc_ring_res(hw, cq); @@ -104,8 +104,7 @@ static void idpf_ctlq_shutdown(struct idpf_hw *hw, struct idpf_ctlq_info *cq) /* Set ring_size to 0 to indicate uninitialized queue */ cq->ring_size = 0;
- mutex_unlock(&cq->cq_lock); - mutex_destroy(&cq->cq_lock); + spin_unlock(&cq->cq_lock); }
/** @@ -173,7 +172,7 @@ int idpf_ctlq_add(struct idpf_hw *hw,
idpf_ctlq_init_regs(hw, cq, is_rxq);
- mutex_init(&cq->cq_lock); + spin_lock_init(&cq->cq_lock);
list_add(&cq->cq_list, &hw->cq_list_head);
@@ -272,7 +271,7 @@ int idpf_ctlq_send(struct idpf_hw *hw, struct idpf_ctlq_info *cq, int err = 0; int i;
- mutex_lock(&cq->cq_lock); + spin_lock(&cq->cq_lock);
/* Ensure there are enough descriptors to send all messages */ num_desc_avail = IDPF_CTLQ_DESC_UNUSED(cq); @@ -332,7 +331,7 @@ int idpf_ctlq_send(struct idpf_hw *hw, struct idpf_ctlq_info *cq, wr32(hw, cq->reg.tail, cq->next_to_use);
err_unlock: - mutex_unlock(&cq->cq_lock); + spin_unlock(&cq->cq_lock);
return err; } @@ -364,7 +363,7 @@ int idpf_ctlq_clean_sq(struct idpf_ctlq_info *cq, u16 *clean_count, if (*clean_count > cq->ring_size) return -EBADR;
- mutex_lock(&cq->cq_lock); + spin_lock(&cq->cq_lock);
ntc = cq->next_to_clean;
@@ -397,7 +396,7 @@ int idpf_ctlq_clean_sq(struct idpf_ctlq_info *cq, u16 *clean_count,
cq->next_to_clean = ntc;
- mutex_unlock(&cq->cq_lock); + spin_unlock(&cq->cq_lock);
/* Return number of descriptors actually cleaned */ *clean_count = i; @@ -435,7 +434,7 @@ int idpf_ctlq_post_rx_buffs(struct idpf_hw *hw, struct idpf_ctlq_info *cq, if (*buff_count > 0) buffs_avail = true;
- mutex_lock(&cq->cq_lock); + spin_lock(&cq->cq_lock);
if (tbp >= cq->ring_size) tbp = 0; @@ -524,7 +523,7 @@ int idpf_ctlq_post_rx_buffs(struct idpf_hw *hw, struct idpf_ctlq_info *cq, wr32(hw, cq->reg.tail, cq->next_to_post); }
- mutex_unlock(&cq->cq_lock); + spin_unlock(&cq->cq_lock);
/* return the number of buffers that were not posted */ *buff_count = *buff_count - i; @@ -552,7 +551,7 @@ int idpf_ctlq_recv(struct idpf_ctlq_info *cq, u16 *num_q_msg, u16 i;
/* take the lock before we start messing with the ring */ - mutex_lock(&cq->cq_lock); + spin_lock(&cq->cq_lock);
ntc = cq->next_to_clean;
@@ -614,7 +613,7 @@ int idpf_ctlq_recv(struct idpf_ctlq_info *cq, u16 *num_q_msg,
cq->next_to_clean = ntc;
- mutex_unlock(&cq->cq_lock); + spin_unlock(&cq->cq_lock);
*num_q_msg = i; if (*num_q_msg == 0) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_controlq_api.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_controlq_api.h index e8e046ef2f0d7..5890d8adca4a8 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_controlq_api.h +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_controlq_api.h @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ struct idpf_ctlq_info {
enum idpf_ctlq_type cq_type; int q_id; - struct mutex cq_lock; /* control queue lock */ + spinlock_t cq_lock; /* control queue lock */ /* used for interrupt processing */ u16 next_to_use; u16 next_to_clean; diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_lib.c index ba645ab22d394..746b655337275 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_lib.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_lib.c @@ -2315,8 +2315,12 @@ void *idpf_alloc_dma_mem(struct idpf_hw *hw, struct idpf_dma_mem *mem, u64 size) struct idpf_adapter *adapter = hw->back; size_t sz = ALIGN(size, 4096);
- mem->va = dma_alloc_coherent(&adapter->pdev->dev, sz, - &mem->pa, GFP_KERNEL); + /* The control queue resources are freed under a spinlock, contiguous + * pages will avoid IOMMU remapping and the use vmap (and vunmap in + * dma_free_*() path. + */ + mem->va = dma_alloc_attrs(&adapter->pdev->dev, sz, &mem->pa, + GFP_KERNEL, DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS); mem->size = sz;
return mem->va; @@ -2331,8 +2335,8 @@ void idpf_free_dma_mem(struct idpf_hw *hw, struct idpf_dma_mem *mem) { struct idpf_adapter *adapter = hw->back;
- dma_free_coherent(&adapter->pdev->dev, mem->size, - mem->va, mem->pa); + dma_free_attrs(&adapter->pdev->dev, mem->size, + mem->va, mem->pa, DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS); mem->size = 0; mem->va = NULL; mem->pa = 0;