[TLDR: This mail in primarily relevant for Linux kernel regression tracking. See link in footer if these mails annoy you.]
On 22.09.23 13:22, Linux regression tracking #adding (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
On 21.09.23 07:02, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
On středa 26. července 2023 11:17:02 CEST Felix Fietkau wrote:
The IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_EXT_NSS_BW value already indicates support for half-NSS 160 MHz support, so it is wrong to also advertise full 160 MHz support.
[...]
and this broke my mt7915-based AP.
However, if I remove `[VT160]` capability from the hostapd config, things go back to normal. It does seem that 160 MHz still works even.
Is this expected?
Thanks for the report.
Removing this from the regression tracking after mentioning the intent to do so due to the tricky striation in my last report to Linus.
#regzbot inconclusive: tricky situation, no simple way out afaics #regzbot ignore-activity
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.